Historic 10-Cent Pieces Survive the Test of Time

By Tom LaMarre, Coins Magazine October 10, 2011

This article was originally printed in Coins Magazine.
>> Subscribe today!

Its name may be French in origin, meaning a tenth part, but the dime is a purely American coin. When the first examples were struck in the 1790s, the Old French “disme” was used. By the early 1800s, “dime” had become the standard spelling, production had increased significantly and new designs had kept pace with the changing times.

It would be difficult to imagine American popular culture without the dime. The late 1800s gave rise to dime banks and dime novels. In the early 1960s, there were dime Cokes, candy bars and comic books. One thin dime would buy two packs of baseball cards.

2012 U.S. Coin Digest: Dimes This easy-to-search pricing and identification download is solely focused on U.S dimes. Get your download today!

Because of inflation, the situation is different today. A tenth of a dollar doesn’t seem like much at all, unless it happens to be one of the rare dimes prized by collectors. The best sell for more than $1 million.

1796

Alexander Hamilton liked the idea of a dime—so did Benjamin Franklin and Mint Director David Rittenhouse. But the U.S. Mint didn’t strike its first dimes until 1796, although a small run of “dismes” was struck in the basement of a Philadelphia saw maker’s shop in 1792.

Using Draped Bust obverse and small eagle reverse dies engraved by Robert Scot, the Philadelphia Mint turned out 22,135 dimes in 1796. Researchers have learned that in addition to the reported mintage, 10,244 1796-dated dimes were struck on Feb. 28, 1797, and 6,380 on March 21, 1797.

Eccentric Texas millionaire E.H.R. Green owned a hoard of mint-state 1796 dimes. They were sold after his death in the 1930s.

Today, you can expect to pay around $25,000 for a Mint State-60 1796 dime, if you are fortunate enough to locate one. At the other end of the grading spectrum, a Good-4 example is valued at nearly $3,000, according to Coin Prices.

1822

Mint records indicate 100,000 dimes were struck in 1822. But this figure is probably incorrect, based on the rarity of 1822 dimes in all grades.

The actual mintage may have been closer to 50,000, including an estimated five proofs struck for VIPs or favored collectors.

The total mintage listed for 1822 probably included many dimes dated 1821, according to an article by Paul Green in Numismatic News.

Coin Prices lists the 1822 dime at values starting at $1,000 in G-4 and peaking at $70,000 for an MS-65. The value of a proof 1822 dime would have to be determined at auction but would definitely be in six figures.

One or more obverse dies dated 1822 were repunched in 1823 and used to strike more than 400,000 dimes. A Very Good-8 1823/22 dime is valued at around $50.

1829 ‘Curl Base 2’

It took a long time for the dime to become a familiar coin. In a report written in 1817, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams said that dimes were “seldom seen, never presented in their material images to the people” and “have remained utterly unknown.”

The situation wasn’t much different 14 years later. The March 11, 1831, issue of the Pittsburgh Gazette reprinted an item from the Boston Transcript, predicting the attempt to introduce dimes into more general circulation would “likely prove abortive.”

The absence of dimes from circulation was despite the fact the Mint struck fairly large quantities in some years. In 1829, for example, it produced 770,000 dimes. It was a banner year for dime varieties, including the rare 1829 “curl base 2.”

Apparently the “curl base 2” obverse die was retired after just brief use, because of a die crack running from the top rim through Liberty’s cap.

John McCloskey discovered the 1829 “curl base 2” dime in a dealer’s stock in Dayton, Ohio, in 1973. Additional examples have since come to light, but most of the survivors are worn or damaged.

Values for the 1829 “curl base 2” dime range from $7,750 for a G-4 specimen to $44,000 for an About Uncirculated example.

1844 ‘Orphan Annie’

The Philadelphia Mint struck more than 1.3 million dimes in 1843 and nearly 2 million in 1845. But in 1844 it turned out only 72,500, and survivors are even scarcer than the mintage might suggest.

Still, it took a long time for collectors to pay any attention to the 1844 dime. Frank C. Ross of Kansas City supposedly “discovered” the 1844 dime’s rarity in 1930. Inspired by the popular comic strip of the same name, he called it the “Orphan Annie dime” because he said it “had no buyers and was just an orphan in the coin world.”

Cynics say “baloney.” They claim the real reason Ross gave the dime such a build-up was that he owned a hoard of 1844 dimes and wanted to pump up their value. However, if you try to find an 1844 dime in a dealer’s stock today, you will most likely come up empty-handed and become a believer in “Orphan Annie” dime’s rarity.

In the 1930s, magazine articles and radio programs spread many legends about 1844 dimes. One story was that the coins were improperly alloyed, making them soft and susceptible to wear. This would explain why so few have survived.

Another explanation was that most of the dimes were melted at the Mint for an unspecified reason. As an alternative, you could choose just about any major disaster to account for the disappearance of the 1844 dimes: the great Johnstown flood, the Chicago fire or any one of a number of shipwrecks.

According to another legend, the dimes were made available to U.S. soldiers during the Mexican War, and, in turn, were given to senoritas.

Yet another story claimed the dimes were on a covered wagon destined for California forty-niners. Indians supposedly attacked and burned the wagon, stole the dimes and buried them for safekeeping. Later, the Indians themselves were killed, taking the secret of the dimes’ hiding place to their graves.

Myths aside, there is no denying the value of the 1844 dime. You can expect to pay around $3,000 for an MS-60 example. In G-4, an 1844 dime is valued at $275.

1846

No one paid much attention to dime mintages in 1846. There were more important things to worry about. On May 11, 1846, Congress declared that a state of war existed with Mexico.

Congress appropriated $10 million for the war effort and authorized President James K. Polk to call out 50,000 volunteers for military service.

The Philadelphia Mint didn’t strike enough dimes to provide even one for each soldier. The 1846 dime had a mintage of only 31,300, including an estimated 10 proofs.

Only a few mint-state survivors are known. An MS-60 1846 Philadelphia dime is valued at $5,500.

1873-CC ‘No Arrows’

The Coinage Act of 1873 increased the dime’s weight to put it on a metric basis. Dimes struck under the new standard were distinguished by arrowheads alongside the date.

Before the change went into effect, the Carson City Mint struck 12,400 1873 dimes without the arrows. But only one survivor is known.

Mint records indicate the 1873-CC “no arrows” dimes were shipped to a distribution point in February 1873. Then they seemed to vanish. Some numismatists think they were melted in July 1873 because banks didn’t need them.

In 1878, a dime described as 1873-CC “Old Style” sold at auction for 17 cents.

Wisconsin collector H.O. Granberg exhibited an 1873-CC “no arrows” dime at the American Numismatic Society in 1914. At a Wayte Raymond auction in 1915, it realized $170.

Subsequent owners of the 1873-CC “no arrows” dime included Rudolph Keller, Waldo Newcomer and Charles M. Williams.

Auctioned again in 1950, the unique dime brought $3,650. Dealers James Kelly and Sol Kaplan became the new owners, but not for long. In November 1950, Louis Eliasberg Sr. acquired the dime. It was the last coin he needed to complete his collection of U.S. coins.

The story of the 1873-CC “no arrows” dime came full circle in 2004 when it was displayed at the Nevada State Museum, formerly the home of the Carson City Mint.

Waldo Bolen paid $550,000 for the dime in 1996. Three years later, Jay Parrino acquired it for $632,500, and later put it on the market for $1 million.

1894-S Liberty Head

Designed by engraver Charles Barber, for whom they were eventually named, the Barber dime, quarter and half dollar went into production in January 1892.

Some collectors consider the dime the most attractive Barber coin. But that wasn’t the case when the design made its debut. The March 24, 1892, issue of the Olean Democrat reported, “The new coins from the Mint this year have run against various objections based on aesthetic grounds, especially the dime.”

Beautiful or not, many 1892 Barber dimes were set aside. However, the Panic of 1893 resulted in diminished demand for coins. In early 1894, the Treasury had a huge stockpile of dimes.

The San Francisco Mint struck only 24 dimes in 1894. Unlike some other rare coins, the 1894-S dimes were not created secretly or without authorization. They were listed in the Mint director’s Annual Report.

Why were they minted? Several theories have been suggested. One is that the San Francisco Mint needed exactly 24 dimes to balance its books at the end of the fiscal year.

Another is that San Francisco Mint Superintendent John Daggett ordered the dimes struck for himself and seven banker friends. Each supposedly received three dimes. Legend has it that Daggett’s daughter, Hallie, spent one for ice cream on her way home.

However, there is little documentation to back up the stories, just speculation or hearsay. According to an item in the San Francisco Call in 1895, the San Francisco Mint clerk received many letters from collectors requesting 1894-S dimes. The standard reply was that none were available.

Records indicate that five 1894-S dimes were sent to Philadelphia for assaying. This information disproves the theory the dimes were struck to balance the books. It also negates the story that Daggett and his banker friends received three dimes apiece.

A more plausible explanation for the striking of the 1894-S dimes came from the San Francisco Mint’s chief clerk, Robert Barnett. In the Nov. 8, 1895, issue of the Kendallville (Ind.) Standard, he was quoted as saying the San Francisco Mint had taken in a large amount of “uncurrent design” silver coins in 1894. As a result, it did not plan to strike any dimes that year.

“However, when nearly all of this subsidiary silver coin bullion had been utilized,” Barnett explained, “we found on our hands a quantity that would coin to advantage only into dimes, and into dimes it was coined, making just 24 of them.”

At the time the article was published, the 1894-S dime reportedly was valued at $5. Today, Coin Prices lists an MS-65 1894-S dime at $1.9 million.

1905 ‘micro O’

New Orleans was a busy place in 1905. A yellow fever epidemic—the city’s last—claimed 450 lives. A new program to combat mosquitoes eliminated any future threat.

In October, President Theodore Roosevelt accepted an invitation to visit New Orleans.

At the New Orleans Mint, it was business as usual. Since the late 1880s, the Mint’s presses often had been kept running on Sundays to meet the demand for dimes. In 1905, it struck more than 3.5 million. But only a small percentage were the “micro O” variety, discovered by Howard R. Newcomb in the 1940s.

Two obverses are known: one with the tip of the “1” to the right of Barber’s initial, and the other with the tip of the “1” directly below the “B.”

In MS-63, a 1905 “micro O” dime is valued at more than $1,500. Fine-12 specimens usually sell for less than $100.

1916-D Mercury

All eyes were focused on the Philadelphia Mint in 1916 as work progressed on outside artists’ designs for a new dime, quarter and half dollar. The design competition had gone smoothly, but transforming the models into finished dies was another matter.

Designed by sculptor Adolph Weinman, the Mercury dime may have been the least troublesome of the three new coins, but it still gave the Mint’s engravers a headache. The first Mercury dimes weren’t’ released until late October 1916, almost four months behind schedule.

The late start was only a partial explanation for the Denver Mint’s striking just 264,000 Mercury dimes in 1916. The entire production run was completed in November. Later the same month, Denver Mint officials were told to concentrate on quarter dollars. Production of other denominations was temporarily suspended.

Many people didn’t see their first Mercury dime until 1917. The Jan. 17, 1917, issue of the Reading Eagle reported:

“For several months the Mints at Denver, San Francisco and Philadelphia have been minting the newly designed coins at the rate of $40,000 worth a day. This sounds like an immense amount of small change, but it takes an immense amount to supply the population of the big country.”

Demand for Mercury dimes was strong in most areas. Many were saved as keepsakes. But there were few coin collectors in Colorado. Apparently, most of the 1916-D dimes went into circulation and stayed there, at least for a while.

Mint-state 1916-D Mercury dimes are expensive today. Coin Prices lists an MS-65 example with “full split bands” in the fasces on the reverse at nearly $50,000.

By modern standards, the 1916-D dime was a rarity from the time it was struck. It turned out to be the lowest-mintage Mercury dime, the only one with a mintage less than 1 million.

To put the figure into perspective, consider that it would have taken the entire production run to pay for the unique gold Studebaker chassis exhibited at the 1916 National Automobile Show. In an ad in the January 1940 issue of The Numismatist, Milwaukee coin dealer John R. Steward offered uncirculated 1916-D dimes for less than $10 each.

In 1996, Littleton Coin Co., of Littleton, N.H., displayed a hoard of 241 1916-D Mercury dimes at the American Numismatic Association convention in Denver. It may have been the largest assemblage of 1916-D dimes in Denver since the year they were minted.

Duplicating the hoard today would be a difficult feat. Even in G-4, a 1916-D Mercury dime will set you back around $1,000.

1942/1 Mercury

The Philadelphia Mint was a busy place in the autumn of 1941. Workers were preparing 1941-dated dies for the then-current year’s coinage and 1942-dated dies for the approaching year.

Apparently an obverse dime die received an impression from a 1941 hub and was sent to the annealing room for hardening. Upon its return, it was mistakenly placed alongside the wrong machinery and was given an impression from a 1942-dated hub.

Most of the 1942/1 dimes were distributed through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The May 1943 issue of Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine reported that Arnold Cohn of Kingston, N.Y., had discovered a 1942/1 Philadelphia dime. A second example was pictured in the June 1943 issue of Numismatic Review.

George Shaw of Brooklyn, N.Y., advertised 1942/1 dimes in the February 1945 issue of Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine.

In the 1990s, Littleton Coin Co. purchased 166 1942/1 dimes from an accumulation called the “New York Subway Hoard.”

The Denver Mint also struck 1942/1 dimes, but they were not widely known until the 1960s. The reason for the delay was that the Denver Mint overdate is not as distinct as the Philadelphia Mint variety. Only portions of the “1” are visible beneath the “2.”

The 1942/1-D dime was first pictured in the 1963 edition of Frank G. Spadone’s Major Variety & Oddity Guide. Its popularity and value have increased dramatically since then. In EF-40, the 1942/1-D dime is valued at $825, while the Philadelphia Mint overdate has a retail value of $750.

Into the Future

From the early Federal period to the Space Age and beyond, the dime has proven to be a real time traveler, surviving changing public tastes and economic conditions. Inflation may further diminish its purchasing power, and coins themselves might someday give way to some kind of electronic substitute. But the best historic dimes will maintain their lofty status as long as there are collectors who appreciate their rarity and remember their stories.

Early Dime Series Begins With 1796

By Paul M. Green, Numismatic News March 15, 2011

This article was originally printed in Numismatic News.
>> Subscribe today!

It’s seems to be a regular thing to read that another early coin of the United States has sold for in excess of $1 million. Suddenly it seems that the historic first issues of the United States have become one of the hot areas of the market and although it’s nice to see the earliest coins of the United States getting their appropriate recognition it can get discouraging for some collectors who simply want to be able to assemble modest collections of these early issues or acquire nice type examples.

Fortunately there are some early issues of the United States that while certainly not common are at least available for collectors of average financial means. While you may not be able to assemble a set in Mint State, the early dimes are one of the areas where you can find some affordable and excellent coins that are every bit as historic as the ones bringing the top auction prices.

2011 U.S. Coin Digest: Dimes Your best reference for the latest details and values for circulating and non-circulating dimes. Get your download today!

For those who are looking for an opportunity in early issues of the United States, the early dimes may prove to be the perfect collection combining good values with historical importance.

In approaching a collection of early dimes, it must be remembered that the grades of dimes from the 1790s are not likely to be what you would find with Roosevelt dimes of the 1990s. The early dime like other early denominations was released into circulation where it would receive heavy use. The times were tough and so were the people and dings, scratches and other problems are fairly common on all early issues including dimes.

Moreover, there were relatively few collectors at the time and those there were seemed to be concentrating primarily on cents because a dime collection while seemingly not very expensive today represented a good deal of money to someone getting by living off the land or being paid a small amount for their labor.

The dime strangely was fairly slow to be produced. It was seemingly a cornerstone denomination in the first Mint Act of April 2, 1792, and in his speech to Congress of that year announcing that half dismes had been produced President Washington in explaining the half dime production pointed to a need for small denominations. Interestingly enough that first half dime production had taken place in the establishment of a Philadelphia sawmaker by the name of John Harper as there was no mint at the time and it appears there was also a pattern for a very similar dime.

We cannot be precisely sure why dimes were never made and it could have been because of any number of reasons. The Harper facility was not up to the task of significant coin production, but it was the best of what were very few choices at the time. Thomas Jefferson, who as Secretary of State was responsible for a Mint actually called the Harper activity the “mint” at one time and if there was a pattern dime it can safely be assumed that it received some official consideration.

The fact is it is very possible that there was simply not enough silver to justify an attempt at production as it appears that the 1,500 half dismes which were thought to have been produced came from silver supplied by someone with there being some suggestion that it was Washington. That cannot be proven but the fact remains that the operation was not an official mint and consequently had its limitations which might have been what stood between the United States and a 1792 dime or disme.

The official United States Mint would open for business in early 1793 but it too had problems. The major one in 1793 was that officials were balking at the idea of posting a required $10,000 bond. Until that dispute was settled there could be no production of gold or silver, so in 1793 all the new U.S. Mint did was to produce copper half cents and large cents.

The matter of the bond was settled in 1794 and at that point the Mint turned its attention to silver issues but not the dime. On paper it makes sense that they would start by producing dollars, but the fact is that their equipment was designed to produced nothing larger than a half dollar. They knew that as well as that the right equipment would be installed the following year, but they went ahead with the dollar effort anyway.

That decision was probably a mistake at least based on the fact that the only thing to come of the effort to produce dollars were 1,758 weakly struck coins. No one thinks that they intended to make just 1,758 dollars, leading us to believe that the 1,758 coins delivered were the only ones to meet rather minimal quality standards. Of the 135 or so known today it is easy to see that strikes were not good and that there were other problems.

Following the dollar adventure, they turned to half dollar and then to half dimes. It is possible that all of the 1794 half dimes were actually struck in 1795 as that is when the first half dime deliveries took place, but we cannot be sure. Whatever the actual striking date there are 1794 and 1795 half dimes, but in 1795 there would be no new silver denominations attempted as it appears the decision was made to try a couple of gold denominations as well as to continue with mintages of denominations already produced, including the first significant numbers of dollars.

By the time the first dime was ready for production in 1796 the initial design of silver coins had been changed to the Robert Scot Draped Bust obverse and small eagle reverse. That would be the design used in 1796 and 1797. Both are tough, with the 1796 having a mintage of 22,135 while the 1797 which was divided between 13- and 16-star varieties had a mintage of 25,261. When you combine the low mintages with the historic importance of the 1796 as the first dime and remember there were just two years of the type today’s prices of $1,650 for the 1796 in AG-3 and similar prices for either variety of the 1797 seem extremely reasonable.

An AG-3 coin is not a particularly nice one. The G-4 prices are nearly double and the F-12 prices are more than triple the AG-3 prices.

Finding an example of either date in Mint State is a much more difficult challenge with all three being priced at right around $25,000. Realistically, that price reflects type demand as the three are not equally available but few collect all three especially in Mint State.

The 13-star variety of the 1797 appears to be the real sleeper of the group in Mint State as the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation has yet to see an example better than AU-58 while the Professional Coin Grading Service reports a single example in Mint State while the 16-star variety has been seen eight times at PCGS and 4 times at NGC. By comparison the 1796, which might have had some small amount of saving at the time as the first dime has been seen 49 times in Mint State at PCGS and 61 times in Mint State at NGC.

The Mint State coins of the type are an interesting group as there are some very nice examples including some that appear to have come from prooflike dies possibly meaning they were intended to be presentation pieces. While there are a few coins at the upper end of the grading scale, the majority of Mint State pieces still shows signs of the minting process at the time in the United States with weak strikes being evident in Liberty’s hair or the center of the stars. In addition there are sometimes small adjustment marks.

In the case of the 1797 where there are so few available, you are likely to have to accept some of these small problems simply because the supply is so limited.

In 1798 the design was changed with the reverse now featuring a large eagle that would remain the basic design until 1807. The most available dates of the period start at $575 in G-4 and $6,850 in MS-60. As they have mintages of at least 100,000, the 1805 and 1807 are the most available of the dates for type collectors in Mint State with the grading service totals for the two being very close.

There are a number of interesting dates from the period, such as the 1798/97 which is found with either 13 or 16 stars. The 16-star variety can be found for roughly $775 in G-4 but the 13-star is $2,150 in the same grade. In XF-40 the 13-star is $14,750 as opposed to $4,350 for the 16-star and the grading services seem to support the price differences. At NGC they report 41 examples of the 16-star variety but a mere six of the 13-star while PCGS has seen the 16-star variety 57 times but the 13-star variety just a dozen times.

It is no accident that the 1805 and 1807 have higher mintages. They reflect the fact that the production of gold eagles and silver dollars had been suspended back in 1804 as the Mint attempted to produce greater numbers of lower denominations. The problem had been the Mint policy of allowing those supplying the silver and gold to select the denominations to be made from their metal. As the bulk of the gold and silver came from institutions such as banks they would tend to order upper denominations with the silver dollar and gold eagle being the highest. Just to make matters worse those coins were frequently exported in the case of the silver dollars or used as reserves meaning they did not circulate so very little progress was being made on solving the national coin shortage. The Mint tried to convince people to take other denominations but when that did not work the next option was to simply stop making silver dollars and gold eagles, which is what happened in 1804. The evidence is not conclusive in all denominations, but at least in the case of the dime the suspension of silver dollar and gold eagle mintages does appear to have made a difference at least in some of the later mintages such as 1805 and 1807 as they were over 100,000 while the previous high dime mintage was 34,640 in 1801.

There is no doubt that the later dates are available in greater numbers in Mint State but the quality of those pieces is sometimes suspect. Q. David Bowers observes in his book, A Guide Book of United States Type Coins that most dimes of the type have problems noting, “Nearly all dimes of this type were struck casually, with the result being some area of lightness.”

That said, there have been a couple truly extraordinary coins that have appeared with the 1805 being reported a couple times in MS-65 while the John Pittman 1807 received an MS-67 from one grading service, but such ultra-grade coins are definitely the exception to the rule.

There are also less available dates that can be very challenging. The 1802 is listed at $1,750 in G-4 but it is a date that could potentially be much more costly if there was greater demand as is seen by the fact that in any grade it has been seen just 23 times by NGC and 25 times by PCGS. Clearly with any significant increase in demand those totals even if there were a few that have not been seen by grading services would not be enough to meet any new demand at today’s prices.

In 1809 the design was changed to a John Reich Liberty Cap. Basically the design would be similar until the introduction of the Seated Liberty design in 1837, but there would be small modifications in 1828 when the diameter was reduced slightly making another type.

In the case of the earlier type finding a nice example is much easier than for the prior issues. A couple dates had mintages in excess of 1 million pieces and that results in an available date being just $39 in G-4 while an MS-60 is currently at roughly $1,100. In the case of the more available dates there are some examples in higher Mint State grades with an MS-63 starting around $2,250 while an MS-65 would begin at around $12,500. There will still be small problems such as weak strikes, but with the better supply you can shop around until you find a nicer example.

There are still some better dates of the type, such as the 1809, which had a mintage of 51,065. This puts it at $140 in G-4 while an MS-60 is $4,500. The 1811/9 is similar with a 65,000 mintage and a $110 G-4 price with an MS-60 at $4,000.

Perhaps the most interesting date of the period is the 1822, which had a listed mintage of 100,000, but that total does not seem right. The 1822 simply does not appear in the numbers that would be expected of a date from the period with a mintage of 100,000. That can be seen with its $1,000 G-4 price, which is well above the lower mintage 1809 or 1811/9.

The grading services also point to problems with the 100,000 mintage as PCGS reports 40 examples of the 1809, 35 of the 1811/9 and just 28 of the 1822. At NGC they report 31 examples of the 1809 and 47 of the 1811/9 but only 30 of the 1822. While the totals are not decisive in every case the fact remains that the 1822 is seen less often than the other dates, which both had mintages well below 100,000 pieces.

The final Liberty Cap dime of the smaller diameter started with the 1828 mintage and continued through 1837. The type is available for $36 and up in G-4 while an MS-60 might be found for as little as $775 with an MS-65 at $6,850.

There is one very special coin of the type in the form of the 1829 with a curl-base “2,” which ranks as one of the toughest coins of a very tough period. The 1829 curl-base “2” currently lists at $7,750 in G-4 and is not even priced in Mint State as there are virtually no numbers in any grade. In fact, the coin would be a great rarity if it was a regular date and there was greater demand as the grading services show PCGS reporting 12 examples with the best being an AU-53 while NGC can account for eight but the best of that group was an F-12. Clearly with a combined total of just 20 examples the 1829 curl-base “2” is a significant but lesser-known rarity and an excellent value at today’s price levels.

The relatively small number of collectors of early dimes has an impact not only on the rarities such as the 1829 curl-base “2,” but also on the more available dates. These were coins that generally had very low mintages and relatively slim prospects for survival to the present day. Compare them with just about any other issue of the United States and you can readily see the value you are getting for your money. In addition you are getting coins from a very historic period as the nation started out and began to grow into the great country it has become. In fact, the dimes reflected that growth with higher mintages and better quality and that makes a collection of early dimes even more interesting.

J&T Coins LLC is now carrying PCGS and NGC graded Mercury Dimes and Full Band (FB) Mercury Dimes.

Click here to view their current inventory.