Polls
Blogroll
- ANA
- CCE/FACTS
- Chinese Coin News
- Coin Update
- Coinnet. We are WI78. A dealer to dealer nationwide network.
- Coinwebsites.Com
- Follow us on Facebook.
- ICTA-Precious Metals Trade Group
- J&T Coins LLC Website
- Oconomowoc Chamber of Commerce
- Visit Waukesha County
Categories
Daily Popular
Rush To Buy Physical Gold And Silver Hasn’t Started Yet
By Patrick A Heller on February 2, 2012 5:00 AM
By Patrick A. Heller – Liberty Coin Service
Commentary on Precious Metals Prepared for CoinWeek.com
Even though gold and silver prices are up significantly since the beginning of 2012, that doesn’t necessarily mean that this trend will continue. Buyers and sellers modify their decisions as prices change.
When you look at who is and who isn’t actively buying or selling gold and silver right now, that can give you significant clues as to where prices head in the near term.
Ever since the price of gold surpassed $1,000 for the first time in 2008, there has been significant liquidation and recycling of “scrap” gold such as jewelry and industrial products. In many instances, people who lost jobs or experienced other financial setbacks have sold assets to generate cash flow. Investment demand in the past three years has been so strong that prices continued to rise despite the increase in recycling supplies. From now into the future, however, the amount of scrap gold that could be liquidated will be smaller than it would have been because of all the gold already recycled.
The story is similar for silver. During the 1979-1980 precious metals boom, many companies acquired equipment to recycle metals. Even though prices later fell so low that it was no longer economical to acquire such equipment, it was still profitable to continue to use existing machines since the acquisition costs had already been paid. As a result, silver recycling continued at a steady pace even when prices were far lower during the past few decades.
Therefore, there is less silver available for recycling today and in the future than there would have been. Another factor to consider is that the use of silver in photography (including x-rays) has fallen sharply in the past decade or so. This is significant because a high percentage of silver used in photography is recycled. As the amount of silver used in photography has fallen, so has the amount of silver that could be recycled.
With higher prices, there would be a strong incentive for mining companies to expand production. However, it’s not quite that simple. From discovery of a mine site until full production used to take an average of about three years. With increasing environmental and other regulations, it now takes an average of about ten years to go into full scale operation.
Increasing regulations have also impacted the ability of existing mines to operate. In January, the government shut down operations at the Lucky Friday mine in Idaho, producer of about 0.5% of the world’s newly mined silver supply. Even though the mine had passed twice-a-year federal safety inspections, it was closed because of alleged problems with its state of the art mine shaft supports. The owner of the mine stated that it will take a full year to fix the alleged safety issues before the mine can resume operation.
Overall, silver mine output has been rising over the years even as global gold mine output mostly declined. Still, silver supply is just not increasing enough to match the rise in demand.
For decades, the central banks were net sellers of gold every year. That changed a couple of years ago to central banks now being net buyers of gold. The swing from being a net supplier to a net buyer has affected the supply/demand equation by about 40 million ounces a year. This is a huge impact when you consider that worldwide annual mine output may be only 70 million ounces.
Above ground inventories of physical gold and silver have dwindled over the past few decades, with supplies of both metals becoming tighter every year. Last year I received several reports of would-be buyers of multi-million dollar amounts of physical gold or silver who wanted to take immediate delivery but were unable to find sellers willing to accept their orders.
While the supply side of gold and silver is constrained, I think the largest impact on the prices of both will come from a surge in buying demand. Even though there has been an increase in demand for the two metals for industrial and investment purposes, the market has not yet experienced a sustained rush to buy physical gold and silver.
For instance, when gold and silver prices fell sharply in late 2008, there were significant delays in purchasing almost every form of bullion-priced physical gold and silver. At the most extreme, new orders for 1 ounce size silver rounds and ingots were taking three months for delivery after the buyers had paid for them. Today, in the US almost every bullion coin and bar is available for live or short term delivery. Premiums are close to as low as they have been over the past couple of years.
The recent weekly Commitment of Traders Report issued by the COMEX show that speculators have not jumped into the market. This means that the price increases have occurred without this source of demand.
China and India are the world’s two largest nations for consumption of gold and silver. What happens in those countries has a major impact on prices.
The Chinese government has been very aggressive at purchasing physical gold and silver for itself and also encouraging its citizens to accumulate precious metals. It is expanding the venues which would make it convenient for people to acquire gold and silver. There are regular stories of Chinese citizens who are unable to purchase physical precious metals because the stores are out of stock or have lines so long that it takes (literally) several hours to get service.
Demand in India is very sensitive to price. When prices fall, demand soars. When prices rise, demand tapers off until there is a sense that the market has established a base from which prices will resume climbing. Right now, buyers in India are mostly sitting on the sidelines since the price of gold broke above $1,700. So, prices rose in the second half of January without extra demand from this nation.
In Europe and the Middle East, there is strong demand for physical gold and, to a lesser extent, silver as safe havens from deteriorating currency values. Demand was especially strong in North America in March and April 2011, but is now lackluster.
Although there have been some investment funds taking positions in gold or silver, this activity has been on a minor scale.
Perhaps the most significant indicator that the rush to buy gold and silver has not started in earnest is the relatively minor importance that the two metals have in world finances. There were times in the first half of the 20th century where the value of gold and silver mining shares and all the circulating gold and silver coins made up more than 20% of global wealth. Today that proportion of worldwide wealth is about 0.5%.
By the way, perhaps a significant indicator of where prices are headed in the near future is a decision by Endeavor Silver to inventory part of its newly mined silver output rather than sell it at current prices. I have heard that other mining companies are discussing this option, where they might only sell enough metal to fund continuing operations. It is highly unusual for mines to choose to defer cash flow in anticipation of much higher prices in the coming months.
The real rush to buy gold and silver will not be underway until there is strong demand from China and India, elsewhere in the Far East, the Middle East, Europe, and across North America. You will also see central banks and investment funds purchasing greater quantities of physical gold and perhaps silver. When fabricators and wholesalers are unable to meet demand for physical metal, prices could skyrocket. We are a long way from this position today. But it is coming and will be here surprisingly soon.
Patrick A. Heller owns Liberty Coin Service and Premier Coins & Collectibles in Lansing, Michigan and writes Liberty’s Outlook, a monthly newsletter on rare coins and precious metals subjects. Past newsletter issues can be viewed at http://www.libertycoinservice.com. Other commentaries are available at Numismaster (http://www.numismaster.com under “News & Articles). His award-winning radio show “Things You ‘Know’ That Just Aren’t So, And Important News You Need To Know” can be heard at 8:45 AM Wednesday and Friday mornings on 1320-AM WILS in Lansing (which streams live and becomes part of the audio and text archives posted at http://www.1320wils.com.
J&T Coins LLC Now Selling NGC S.S. Republic Seated Liberty Silver Half Dollars Shipwreck effect. You may purchase these historic coins by clicking here or calling 866-267-6024.
J&T Coins LLC Est 2001
Viewpoint: Coins, Moon Rocks Show Priority Issue
| By Richard L. Francis, Numismatic News January 26, 2012 |

Other News & Articles
This article was originally printed in Numismatic News.
>> Subscribe today!
As a parent, I have learned the importance of choosing your battles. In other words, addressing the things that are most significant. That said, it troubles me to think that the government has not yet learned this lesson.
I followed with much interest the Langbord trial involving the 10 1933 double eagles. Regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with the court’s decision, the government’s action to sue over possession of 10 coins begs the question, “Don’t they have more important things to do?”
Within the scope of the many responsibilities of the government, I feel the quest for ownership of 10 coins to be minuscule in comparison.
I would like to say that the above is an isolated incident and that the government does have its priorities straight, however, after reading a recent Associated Press story, it seems it does not.
In the Oct. 24 article, Joann Davis, a 74-year-old grandmother, was trying to raise money for her sick son. She emailed a NASA contractor May 10 trying to find a buyer for the rock, one she claims was given to her space-engineer husband by Neil Armstrong in the 1970s.
The moon rock was one of many space-related heirlooms her husband left her when he passed away in 1986. NASA contends moon rocks are government property.
After Davis’ call to NASA, investigators arranged a “sting,” where a government agent met with Davis. Soon after she presented the moon sample, about half a dozen sheriff’s deputies and NASA investigators rushed into the meeting place. Officers took hold of Davis and took her outside. Davis said, “They grabbed me and pulled me out of the booth.”
She continued, “I had very, very deep bruises on my left side.” The 4-foot, 11-inch woman said she was so scared she lost control of her bladder. She was detained and questioned for two hours. Davis was allowed to go home, without the moon rock, and was never booked or charged with any wrongdoing.
According to Joseph Gutheinz, a University of Phoenix instructor and former NASA investigator who has spent years tracking down missing moon rocks, said NASA did not always take good care of lunar materials. In some instances, space suits were simply hosed off and any moon dust on them was lost forever.
While bigger rocks, such as those given to various countries and museums, were carefully inventoried and tracked, it now appears that there are unknown numbers of much smaller pieces circulating in the public. Some of those may have been turned into paperweights and given away by NASA engineers.
While NASA has given hundreds of lunar samples to nations, states and high-profile individuals, it is with the understanding they remain government property. In other words, any moon rock or moon dust particle cannot be sold according to the government.
It should be noted that while authentic, the sample in question is smaller than a piece of rice. Obviously, the early actions of NASA indicate little interest in such particles, hosing down its space suits and losing these moon dust particles forever. Why now are these particles of such high importance?
I must now ask, would the government pursue with the same vigor, ownership and possession of an item they felt they had claim to, however, which had little monetary value? If not, can we call this a case of selective prosecution?
While on the subject of selective prosecution, let me pose this question. If the government feels they have ownership of any coin unofficially released from the Mint, why has no effort been made to claim the five 1913 Liberty nickels?
As the coins were certainly produced within the walls of the Mint, and with no official record of their production, one would think the government could make a strong case of ownership and seek their return. The same argument could be made with regard to pattern pieces.
While many legal arguments can be made with regard to government ownership of coins, moon dust, etc., one has to wonder, doesn’t the government have more important things to do?
This Viewpoint was written by Richard L. Francis, a hobbyist from Cape Girardeau, Mo. Viewpoint is a forum for the expression of opinion on a variety of numismatic subjects. To have your opinion considered for Viewpoint, write to David C. Harper, Editor, Numismatic News, 700 E. State St., Iola, WI 54990. Send email to david.harper@fwmedia.com.
Precious Metals that can be held in an IRA or 401k
By NewDirectionIRA on January 27, 2012 11:40 AM
Many clients are inquiring about their self directed New Direction IRA account buying metals. If you’ve taken an interest in purchasing real precious metals with your retirement account, it’s important to know what types of metals are allowable and the qualifications that must be followed to satisfy the IRS’ guidelines. This article sheds light of many of the different options available to precious metal investors and covers some of the more specific information regarding specific types of coins and bullion products for IRA investments.
First, let’s cover the basics. Your self directed IRA can only invest in Gold, Silver, Platinum and Palladium. The keyword here is “invest”. Your IRA cannot buy collectibles – your IRA is only investing in the metal itself, not rare or attractive coins. The metal must be in a certain form (usually coins or bars) and/or of certain purity. The purity or fineness of the metal is how the quality of the metal will be measured for your IRA.
When most of us hear about gold investment we picture the 400 ounce gold bars we have seen in movies. Extraordinarily heavy (about 25 pounds), those bars are also quite the expensive items, particularly with the recent price increases in gold. IRAs are often priced out of the gold bar market, but, fortunately, other options exist. One other option is smaller units of bullion, provided they meet the fineness, or purity level, requirement. Another option is coins.
Initially, the IRS deemed all coins to be collectable and disallowed IRA investments in coins.
In the mid-1990s, after realizing that a 400 ounce gold bullion bar would be prohibitively expensive for most IRAs, Congress revised the rules and allowed IRAs to own certain coins in addition to bullion.
Generally these IRA allowable coins fall into two categories:
Category #1: Coins specifically listed in the Internal Revenue Code, and defined as NOT being collectable. These include only the American Eagle coins minted by the US Mint. Specific coins include:
- American Gold Eagles – Proof and Non-Proof
These coins are issued by the US Mint in both Proof and Uncirculated (non-proof) form. Because the coins are specifically listed as NOT being collectables, they are allowed in your IRA. Prices for Proof and Non-Proof Gold Eagle coins vary due to a number of factors including the availability, original production, and date.
Interestingly, these US minted coins are not of sufficient purity to classify them as bullion. They are only approximately 91% pure gold. The other material in the coin off sets the softness of the gold and makes the coin more durable. Gold Eagles arrive in one of 4 forms: 1/10, ¼, ½ and 1 full ounce coins.
- American Silver Eagles. – Proof and Non-Proof
These coins are issued by the US Mint in both Proof and Uncirculated form. Because the coins are specifically listed as NOT being collectables, they are allowed in your IRA in proof and non-proof form. Prices for Proof and Non-Proof Silver Eagle coins vary due to a number of factors including the availability, original production, and date. Silver Eagles land in only one form: 1 full ounce coin. They are of bullion fineness, but are only .999 (three nines) due to the addition of a touch of copper for added durability.
- American Platinum Eagles. Proof and Non-Proof.
These coins are issued by the US Mint in both Proof and Uncirculated form. Because the coins are specifically listed as NOT being collectables, they are allowed in your IRA in proof and non-proof form. Prices for Proof and Non-Proof Platinum Eagle coins vary due to a number of factors including the availability, original production, and date. The rarest of birds, the Platinum Eagles are minted in 4 forms: 1/10, ¼, ½ and 1 ounce coins. These are of .9995 fineness.
Any of the above coins which have been graded for condition by certification organizations and placed in tamper-proof plastic containers called “slabs”, will generally fall into the collectible category and thus are not allowed for IRAs. Recently a national certification service has initiated an authentication service for bullion coins. Authentication provides a guarantee as to the purity of the metal and the weight of the coin. While the authentication process does place the coin in a tamperproof container and give it a unique serial number, it is intended for verification only and does not move the bullion into the collectable category.
If you’re not sure about this, ask your self directed IRA provider or metals dealer. All US minted coins have nominal face values, but the true value is based on the value of the metal in the coin.
Category #2: Some coins meet the minimum fineness requirements but are not rare enough to receive collector attention.
- American Gold Buffalo coins. Non-Proof Only
First minted in 2006, they are of bullion fineness, .9999 fine (known as four nines). Note that the specially processed proof version of this coin is NOT acceptable, due to the treatment raising the value of the coin beyond the value of the metal.
- Gold Coins – .995+ note that gold is a soft metal (although heavy) and thus most typical minting includes other alloys to harden the coin. Therefore most minted gold coins intended for use as currency do not meet the fineness requirement.
- Silver Coins – .999+
- Platinum – .9995+
- Palladium – .9995+
Non-coin forms of metal, such as smaller gold bars, must be manufactured to meet specific weight specifications for the amounts of metal included and meet the above fineness requirements.
In addition to these American options, there are some coins issued by mints of other nations that do meet the fineness requirements:
- Australian Nugget (Kangaroo) Gold coins .9999 fine
- Australian Kangaroo and Kookaburra Silver coins .999
- Australian Koala Platinum coin .9995 fine
- Austrian Philharmonic Gold coins .9999 fine
- Austrian Philharmonic Silver coins .999 fine
- Canadian Maple Leaf Gold coins .9999 fine
- Canadian Maple Leaf Silver coins .9999 fine
- Canadian Maple Leaf Platinum coins .9995 fine
- Canadian Maple Leaf Palladium coins .9995 fine
- Mexican Libertad Silver Coins .999 fine
- Isle of Man Noble Platinum coins .9995 fine
Some examples of coins that don’t meet the fineness requirements are: Austrian Corona and Ducat, Belgian Franc, British Sovereign and Britannia, Chilean Peso, Columbian Peso, Dutch Guilder, French Franc, German Mark, Hungarian Korona, Italian Lira, Mexican Peso and Ounza, South African Krugerrand, Swiss Franc, and any coin that falls into the “Rare”, and thus collectible, category.
Again, if you’re not sure about the fineness, ask your metals dealer to verify it.
Next time, we will talk about the process of getting metals into your IRA or other tax sheltered account. Note that Health Savings Accounts, another plan that can be self directed, is also eligible to be self directed and purchase metals.
The Coin Analyst: Many Experts Expect Precious Metals to Perform Well in 2012, But Prices Will Remain Very Volatile
By Louis Golino on January 16, 2012 8:14 AM
by Louis Golino for CoinWeek.com
One of the purposes of this column is to provide readers with coverage and analysis of the constantly evolving markets for precious metals because those dynamics play such a big role in today’s coin market.
After a difficult fourth quarter of 2011 when metals declined sharply, prices have been rebounding recently, and gold in particular is in a consolidation phase, building a base of support in the $1600-1700 range.
Silver and platinum have been underperforming compared to gold, although both are off their recent lows of roughly $26 and $1400. At their current levels of roughly $30 and $1500 respectively, both white metals look like a bargain to me, especially if the economy continues to improve.
As they were falling in price during the fall, commentators were again proclaiming the end of the gold bubble, or at least questioning whether gold had peaked, something which mainstream financial analysts do almost every time gold declines a few dollars.
In fact, most serious gold analysts, such as Jeffrey Nichols, a precious metals columnist for Coin World, believe gold will be several multiples of its current price in the coming years.
Mr. Nichols said recently that he thinks gold could see as much as a 50% gain in 2012 from the recent low of about $1580. “Prices of $3000, $4000, and even $5000 an ounce are very likely during the course of this long-lasting bull market, a bull market that still has years of life left to it,” according to Mr. Nichols, who regularly travels to China to speak on gold.
Europe and the Dollar
The decline in metals that took place after gold peaked in early September was driven by three main factors.
First, hedge funds and other institutional investors had to liquidate precious metals to cover losses in other asset classes that had not performed as well; second, such investors typically rebalance their portfolios at the end of a year; third, the European debt crisis resulted in a flight to quality, as investors sought the perceived safety of U.S. Treasury securities.
If the situation in Europe deteriorates, that will probably drive gold in particular to new highs, as wealthy Europeans seek to preserve their assets in the face of a declining euro.
The unusual circumstances that prevailed in the fall, when gold declined as concerns mounted about Europe, may be ending, and the more normal pattern of seeking refuge in gold, rather than the dollar, may return.
However, heightened volatility is widely expected. If the U.S. economy continues to rebound during the year, which is by no means assured, gold could face substantial temporary headwinds.
Meanwhile, both the Indian wedding season and the Chinese Lunar New Year are approaching, which helps underpin demand, since gold and silver are the most popular gifts for both occasions.
Inflation
Precious metals are often described as an inflation hedge more than anything, but I think the relationship between inflation and precious metals is more complex than most people realize. There is no reason gold and other precious metals can not increase in the absence of inflation, as has been the case for years now.
A reader commentary published in Numismatic News recently argued that because inflation is likely to remain low, metal prices will remain low, and silver may never even reach $50 again. The writer was responding to the almost constant talk one hears from some bullion watchers that hyperinflation is a looming threat in the U.S., a point most economist would dispute.
When it comes to inflation, one must distinguish between the short to medium-term and the longer-term outlook. I think one also has to make distinctions in terms of regions of the world since some currently face inflationary pressures, while others face deflationary prospects.
It is likely that while our economy is still getting back on its feet, which will take several more years at a minimum, inflation will continue to trend low within the U.S., and in Europe there are even concerns about deflation, as recession fears grow.
In China and other emerging market economies inflation has indeed trended higher in the last couple years, providing part of the impetus for gold and silver demand there, but inflation in China has begun to moderate in recent months.
It is also true that the U.S. government, through its calculation of the consumer price index, understates the real rate of inflation, probably to save money on entitlement programs that have cost of living adjustments based on the rate of inflation.
But that does not change the fact that there is little likelihood of high inflation, or especially of hyperinflation, in the short-term, though it could emerge at some point in the future, especially if the dollar continues losing purchasing power, or even collapses.
Quantitative easing
The hyperinflationists point to the two rounds of quantitative monetary easing the Federal Reserve has engaged in since the start of the current crisis and argue that all that money creation will lead to high inflation (which it may indeed, just not for some time).
In a slow economy in which people and companies are hoarding their cash, a lot of those extra dollars the Fed has printed are not circulating. They are sitting on the balance sheets of banks and corporations.
That partly explains why the monetary easing programs have not resulted in much inflation so far. The inflation we have seen has been primarily in energy costs, which are not part of what the government calls core inflation (something I have always found odd).
In fact, many gold bulls keep hoping the Fed will announce another round of quantitative easing, believing that is the sure path to higher prices.
More QE would indeed be bullish for metals because it will lead to further dollar depreciation and weakness, not because hyperinflation is on the horizon. But given all the controversy surrounding QE 1 and 2, the Fed will be very careful before undertaking QE 3, and is only likely to do that if the U.S. economy reverses course and conditions worsen substantially.
In Europe the prospects for monetary easing are much stronger, perhaps even inevitable, since it is probably the only way to deal with the debt crisis there, i.e., through reflation, or devaluation of existing debt. But that action will also lay the groundwork for the next crisis.
Interest rates
When it comes to understanding the precious metals markets and where metal prices appear to be headed, it is the interest rate, especially the yield on U.S. government debt and other supposedly safe bonds, that really matters, at least in the absence of serious inflationary pressures.
That is because if investors at some point down the road are able to receive a decent after-inflation return on assets which at least in their view are relatively risk-free, such as Treasury bonds, they will flock to them, which is likely to depress stock and metal prices. Riskier assets tend to underperform when interest rates rise.
But we are years away from any such development, and that is probably the main reason why most precious metal experts think the gold bull run will not end anytime soon. Gold should continue to do well as long as real interest rates (after inflation) remain negative. It is even possible that gold and other metals could rise after rates are substantially higher, depending on overall economic conditions.
In addition, new supplies from mine production will not be enough to satisfy expected future demand, as Mr. Nichols noted. And central bank purchases and long-term gold buyers in Asia are reducing the available supply of the metal.
Recent data out of China shows a record amount of gold was imported, as Chinese authorities seek to diversify their financial holdings. And it is illegal to export gold out of China.
The bottom line for gold and the rest of the precious metals complex in 2012 is they are widely expected to perform very well, but volatility will remain very high. Investors should expect declines of 20% like the recent one, or even more, but the trend line will likely still be up substantially in December.
Louis Golino is a coin collector and numismatic writer, whose articles on coins have appeared in Coin World, Numismatic News, and a number of different coin web sites. His column for CoinWeek, “The Coin Analyst,” covers U.S. and world coins and precious metals. He collects U.S. and European coins and is a member of the ANA, PCGS, NGC, and CAC. He has also worked for the U.S. Library of Congress and has been a syndicated columnist and news analyst on international affairs for a wide variety of newspapers and web sites.
Veterans Take Charge at FUN
10/01/12
Veterans Take Charge at FUN
| By Patrick A. Heller January 09, 2012 |

Other News & Articles
The 2012 Florida United Numismatists show was held in Orlando Jan. 5-8. The FUN show is the largest in the United States and possibly the largest annual dealer bourse in the world. Much can be learned about the current state of the rare coin market by keeping tabs on the relative level of activity at this show.
The show, as usual, was well attended and the auction sessions in total produced some very impressive results. However, when you dig down into the details, not everything in the numismatic market is rosy.
Because of other time commitments, I had to leave the show early. However, I have talked with some longtime dealers who staffed their booth for the entire show. Overall, activity was booming on Thursday and Friday, but fell off sharply on Saturday.
2012 U.S. Coin Digest: Gold Coins The one-stop reference when you’re looking for quick and reliable details about U.S. gold coins! Get your download today! |
Synthesizing what I observed and was told by other dealers, it looked like much of the retail demand came from well-established collectors, with lighter than usual interest from newer numismatists. A number of key-date and high grade coins sold, but common everyday stuff tended to stay in inventory.
One weak area of the market was pre-1934 U.S. gold coins. Some dealers told me they did not sell a single specimen to a retail customer over the course of the show. There has been weakness in demand for U.S. gold coins for several months now, but prices that are 10-20 percent lower than early September 2011 did not seem to entice buyers. Of course, over the years I have seen that U.S. buyers tend to stop purchasing gold coins (both bullion-priced and numismatic) when prices are falling. Typically, they do not resume buying until there have been noticeable and consistent price increases. So, this lack of demand for U.S. gold coins at the FUN show was almost to be expected.
I “walked the floor” at the show rather than staffed a booth. As such, I only offered my inventory to dealers with tables. My own sales were well above what I expected. Generally, the dealers with tables were satisfied with their sales at the show, though none reported record results.
One surprise at the show was the number of representatives from eBay in attendance. They met with several dealers, with representatives of the Professional Numismatists Guild and possibly other organizations. Apparently, the Secret Service is now actively trying to train some personnel to intercede in the large number of Chinese counterfeit coins coming into the U.S., with a sizable quantity of them being offered for sale in eBay auctions. It is possible that eBay’s sudden heightened interest in working to stop the auctions of counterfeits may be tied to the increased attention from the Secret Service. Look for possible developments where one or more numismatic organization might become involved in combatting eBay auctions of counterfeit coins or possibly endorsing select eBay sellers. One such possibility, for instance, might be where eBay identifies sellers who are members of PNG so that buyers could search only for lots offered by these sellers.
I have one story about Chinese counterfeits. One dealer showed me a counterfeit Bust dollar that he had purchased in an eBay auction. In the auction listing, it was properly identified in the title as a replica. The photo with the auction properly showed that the word “copy” was stamped into the piece. However, the piece received by the dealer was not marked “copy.” To the uninformed person, it could easily be mistaken as a genuine coin.
It is possible that a number of dealers may owe so much money for past auction purchases that they are forced to auction more coins than usual to pay off those debts. To the extent that this may be occurring (and I have no hard data to prove or disprove this – just the perception of some dealers who regularly auction parts of their inventory) the market may be having an excess number of rare coins liquidated right now. Excess material being offered in auction would typically result in lower prices being realized, which would lead to downward pressure on rare coin prices in general. In the current difficult economic environment across the United States and worldwide, this is a plausible scenario.
I asked a variety of dealers how the year 2011 was for them. The most common response from those who deal strictly in numismatic items was that their sales were roughly even with 2010. Those dealers who also trade bullion coins and ingots reported volume was up significantly. Dealers who also buy gold jewelry from the public reported the strongest results of all. For rare coin and bullion dealers who are used to working on small margins, the profits from purchasing gold jewelry are a bonanza. It is easy for them to almost always pay higher prices to purchase jewelry than other companies like jewelers, antique stores and second-hand stores that normally work on much larger profit margins. This last sentence may sound self-serving to coin dealers, but various surveys consistently confirm this result.
So, the indications from the FUN show are that the rare coin market is not dead, nor is it soaring. That means that there are opportunities for savvy buyers to add to their holdings at reasonable prices. But that also means that there are a number of numismatic sectors that are likely to be stagnant or even in decline for the next few years. Have fun, but be considerate and careful.
Patrick A. Heller owns Liberty Coin Service and Premier Coins & Collectibles in Lansing, Mich., and writes “Liberty’s Outlook,” a monthly newsletter on rare coins and precious metals subjects. Past newsletter issues can be viewed at http://www.libertycoinservice.com. Other commentaries are available at CoinUpdate (http://www.coinupdate.com). He also writes a bi-monthly column on collectibles for “The Greater Lansing Business Monthly” (http://www.lansingbusinessmonthly.com/articles/department-columns). His radio show “Things You ‘Know’ That Just Aren’t So, And Important News You Need To Know” can be heard at 8:45 a.m. Wednesday mornings on 1320-AM WILS in Lansing (which streams live and becomes part of the audio and text archives posted at http://www.1320wils.com).
I was Wrong About Silver in 2011
06/01/12
I was Wrong About Silver in 2011
By Jim Kingsland on January 6, 2012 9:06 AM
By Jim Kingsland for Certified Assets Management International
A CoinWeek Content Partner
In March, 2011 I took the pro silver side of a gold/silver debate in CoinAge Magazine on which metal would outperform on a percentage basis in 2011. My positive silver ideas were empowered by the freight train momentum that developed early last year for silver that eventually shot silver to within a hair’s width of closing above $50 in late April.
Obviously, my bullish outlook was destroyed thanks to the series of margin hikes that were implemented by the Chicago Merc. I’ll say it: When the real owners of the market (various giant banks), with their massive short positions in silver were about to be shellacked, the silver bulls had to be neutered (of course they and I forgot about the possibility of not one or two margin hikes, but of many margin hikes). Yes, you could argue that slower world economic growth, even good old profit taking chilled the price of silver, but those margin hikes in and of themselves are what led to the collapse of silver from its 2011 high.
In 2011, silver fell 7 percent, while gold rose 10%. While I am no longer going to take an official bullish, or bearish stance on silver, let’s say I am waiting for the opportunity to pick up MS state generic Morgan dollars (those beautiful silver coins from the late 1800′s to the early 20th century) in the $25 range. The coins should either be certified by PCGS, or NGC and encased in plastic holders. You can do the math, but I will do it for you. Since there is a slight premium for Morgans to the spot silver price, at the present $27.78 spot price, to get my $25 buy price on Morgans will require action that my bullish friends won’t enjoy. This bottoming process could take some time to play out, but who knows.
My thought is to have nothing to do with silver futures, or SLV and pick up the real thing on further dips as some very cheap insurance, not as a way to game a new silver bull market, but has a hedge. Forget about the silver to gold ratio for now. Yes, it’s out of whack historically, but then again this isn’t a late 19th century bi-metallist society that we’re living in. We are living in a deranged system where everything, including these metals, are priced in the ever vanishing power of the paper dollar (which is masked by what everyone focuses too much attention on – that dollar index). Forget about the kook internet reports of physical silver being priced well above the spot paper price. Little old me as a coin dealer can still get silver for about $1 over spot and lots of it, not just a few ounces.
The rumors of a physical shortage of silver is a sales tactic aimed at getting ignorant people to pay a big premium to the hucksters. Forget about all of the claims that silver will become so rare soon that it will be rarer than gold. That one leaves me speechless. The tall tales are fun, but none, NONE have kept silver out of an ongoing downward trend. The best apologists for silver in the business have been largely ineffective. For now, the silver market is muddled and will remain so, so long as the CME and its margin hikes remain. Funny that they haven’t since removed the hikes, now that things have calmed down. But I digress.
Insurance to offset the collapsing paper ponzi system – now that’s not so crazy. We buy insurance for all sorts of potential negative events. I believe that one day silver will become far more valuable than it is now, but let’s not be so anxious for that to happen. When this dog called silver eventually has its day, there will be many other things to be worrying about (eg. securing supplies of food, etc). Silver, and gold for that matter, should be accumulated by people who have an understanding about the monumental shift that’s taking place. What would that be? The coming end to fiat paper, back to hard money. This has happened before in society. It is unlikely to be pleasant. There are many who have admitted to me that they want nothing to do with silver, or gold – that they have faith in the present system. I am fine with that, though they register in my mind as the sitting ducks class. Lol.
Three Major Coin Market Trends Transition from 2011 to 2012
By Mark Ferguson on January 6, 2012 8:56 AM
By Mark Ferguson for CoinWeek – MFRareCoins.com
There have been three major trends driving the coin market during 2011 that are continuing to influence the market into 2012. All three of these trends are economically driven.
The most influential of these trends has its roots deep within the global economy. It’s the global debt bubble. Here in America that debt load reaches from individuals to municipalities, county governments, state governments, and finally the Federal government. And sovereign debt, as we all know, is in crisis mode around the globe.
As a result, gold has been a hot commodity throughout 2011 and during prior years. Many financial professionals even refer to gold as a currency. Silver has also been considered a financial metal, in addition to its industrial utility, and routinely follows the market trend on the heels of gold. Although, we’ve seen some divergence in the short-term market trends between these two metals as the gold market has reacted to economic crises, especially as its price has climbed during 2011, as shown in the charts below. This divergence is illustrated as the gold price was driven to comparatively loftier levels than the silver price during the July to August period when Congress found itself in a stalemate over raising the debt limit.
Gold began 2011 at a closing price on the London exchange on January 4 at $1,388 and ended up the 2011 year at a closing price of $1,531 on December 29. In the interim it reached a closing price of $1,895 on two consecutive days, September 5 and 6, after breaking through the $1,900 benchmark in intraday trading. The low price for gold during 2011 was a closing price of $1,319 on the London exchange on January 28.
Silver started 2011 at a London closing price of $30.67 on January 4 and ended up at a closing price of $28.18 on December 30. During the interim in 2011 silver reached a high closing price on the London exchange of $48.70 on April 28, after coming within cents of its all-time high price earlier in the day. The 2011 low was $26.16 on December 29. The silver price showed strength from mid-July to mid-September by remaining in the low $40s during that time, while the gold price continued to advance to its all-time high of around $1,900.
But those are just short-term trends. Below are charts of the gold and silver prices from January, 2000 to the present. Clearly, these two metals are in a long-term price trend that’s rising. You can see how silver prices are traditionally more volatile than gold prices. Of course, when investing in these metals, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to pick the short-term highs and lows at which to buy and sell. I urge my customers to go with the long-term trend. Don’t buck the trend. Don’t try to outguess the market. Dollar cost averaging, by purchasing at various price levels over a period of time, is often used by some of my customers to even out their costs when buying.
So, what does all this mean to the coin business? It has meant much more business for coin dealers, but higher prices for collectors who collect common date coins that are heavily influenced by gold and silver prices. On the other hand, many collectors have used these price advances as opportunities to cull out some of their common gold and silver coins and use the proceeds to purchase more expensive collector coins they’ve always wanted, but couldn’t afford.
The higher prices have also brought out into the market lots of accumulations of coins the general public has had stashed away for decades. And along with the gold and silver coins the public has sold to coin dealers have been coins of better date “collector coins.” Some better date silver coins have gone into the melting pot, as their collector values have been exceeded by their silver values. But a lot of these kinds of coins have wound up in coin dealers’ inventories.
And this illustrates another major trend in the coin hobby. Except for some die-hard collectors who have solid jobs, middle class collectors have been largely cut out of the collecting market. Job losses, debt reductions, and general caution over spending have curtailed their coin collecting activities, and some established collectors have had to become coin sellers, instead of coin buyers, for the same reasons. This trend has resulted in soft prices and lower sales for many collector coins regularly purchased by the middle class – which is the majority of people.
So if it wasn’t for all the increased business in the precious metals area, many coin dealers probably would have been forced to close up shop during the past two or three years. Instead, most dealers have had very good years in business during that time.
However, on the high end of the coin market, business has been brisk in selected areas. Investors looking for alternatives to main stream investment vehicles have been buying high end rare coins, including “trophy rarities,” in which to park some of their money.
A great example of this is the 1787 Brasher Doubloon, with the “EB” punch on the eagle’s breast, which sold for $7.395 million at the end of 2011. This is now the third rare coin that has sold for more than $7 million. The first was back in 2002 when a famous 1933 $20 Saint Gaudens gold coin sold for $7.59 million. It’s the only example of this coin issue that the U.S. government has legally allowed to be privately owned. The third coin ever to sell for more than $7 million was a 1794 silver dollar, believed by some numismatic researchers to have been the first silver dollar struck at the U.S. Mint. It brought $7.85 million during spring, 2010.
Of these three sales, the recent Brasher Doubloon sale has best demonstrated how much great American numismatic rarities have appreciated in price during the past several years. I’ve been writing regular major market reports about the U.S. coin market for the past decade or more, for several publications, and in doing so I’ve observed these transactions and have knowledge about the backgrounds of some of these coins and have talked to some of the principals involved. I know most of them well and do business with them. This Brasher Doubloon, one of just two pieces known, but also unique in its own right, is one of the most important coins in American numismatics, and for that matter, is also one of the most important coins in world numismatics.
Of the other two coins mentioned above, the 1933 $20 Saint Gaudens coin came from Europe when it surfaced, just a few years before its famous 2002 public auction sale in which the U.S. government participated – an interesting story to search for if you’re not familiar with it. These 1933 $20 gold coins were illegal for Americans to own and some numismatists believe this 1933 $20 is the famous King Farouk specimen, sold during the 1940s. Previously, it could not have been sold publicly, as it was in 2002, because of the risk of confiscation by the U.S. government, until it became the only example of this coin issue to be declared legal to own. So a previous price was never established in which to compare the 2002 sale.
Similarly, the 1794 silver dollar mentioned above was thoroughly researched by the seller and is believed to be the first silver dollar ever struck at the U.S. Mint. It was given the status and grade of “Specimen-66” by PCGS, and previous to its sale, it was extensively exhibited by the owner who has referred to this coin as a national treasure. Reportedly, the seller purchased it several years before the 2010 sale for “millions of dollars,” but its status had been elevated during the time he owned it, making it difficult to compare its price appreciation with the coin’s previous status.
So, the recent sale of the Brasher Doubloon for a reported $7.395 million, with the Ephraim Brasher “EB” punch on the breast, as compared to the other example which has the punch on the wing, is most important in illustrating the trend of the market for trophy rarities because it is a coin that has been known for years and has been exhaustively researched. It has not had a change in status like the other two important coins mentioned above have had. This doubloon was last sold at public auction during January, 2005 for $2,990,000…and now for $7.395 million in a private transaction.
So what are the people who invest such large sums of money expecting when they buy these trophy rarities? First, such buyers aren’t just freely throwing their money around, like the proverbial rice after a wedding ceremony. Negotiations for such rarities are usually well thought out, and sometimes tricky. Secondly, buyers expect these coins to at least hold their values, but hopefully to appreciate. They are looking for investments that are alternatives to risky mainstream investments, and these buyers are often expecting economic inflation during the next several years. And thirdly, another consideration taken into account is the vast price differential between these high end numismatic rarities and record-selling works of fine art, which are now bringing more than $100,000,000 on the high end.
While the coin market probably won’t see those nine figure price levels anytime soon, the reasoning is…there’s huge potential for the price of famous American numismatic rarities to close the gap with fine art, even by a comparatively small margin. Therefore, is it possible that some of the great American numismatic rarities could become worth $25 million or more, for example? Absolutely!
Some Slabs Better Accepted by Market
| By Harry Miller, Coins Magazine January 04, 2012 |

Other News & Articles
This article was originally printed in Coins Magazine.
>> Subscribe today!
Over the last 30 years coin certification has had a tremendous effect on grading and most would suggest a very positive one. However, there are pitfalls. One very large one is the proliferation of copycat grading services. These are companies that often have names very similar to reputable well-known companies, but are off-shoots of telemarketers. The coins slabbed (certified) by these companies are usually slightly off quality and would not normally certify at a reputable service.
Coins Magazine One Year Subscription A hobby leader in providing collectors with important and timely information key to making wise decisions. Get your subscription today! |
Experienced numismatists generally avoid these slabs. Very experienced numismatists will examine these same items and locate an occasional bargain where a coin was undergraded or a variety was overlooked.
The first reputable service was created by the American Numismatic Association and its product consisted of a photo certificate with an obverse grade and a reverse grade. Since the coin was not permanently sealed in a holder, there were immediate issues regarding handling and possible guarantees. So the slab was invented.
Today we have perhaps half a dozen reputable services and hundreds of flaky ones. The pitfall mentioned above is that those new to the hobby or those who just wish to put some hard assets away as insurance often get trapped with the second-rate slabs. The typical telemarketer will offer a coin in, say, an MS-66 holder at something under an MS-65 price, convincing the buyer that it is almost as good as the top brands and look at the price at less than half the going rate. Of course, it should probably be nearer to one-quarter the price.
The reputable services have also contributed to the dilemma by promoting ultra-high grade and first issue items under various titles. These are items made for unsuspecting collectors and unknowledgeable investors who are foolish enough to think that these are actual collectible rarities similar to vintage coins that are truly scarce.
There is absolutely no comparison to a superb gem Morgan dollar and an MS-69 or MS-70 silver Eagle, or a modern commemorative coin. If you don’t agree with this, then go to a major show and see what you get offered for properly slabbed MS-69 silver Eagles. Now if you like silver Eagles, slabbed are a nice way to go, but don’t pay huge premiums for them. They are not rare. Yes, I know certain dates in MS-70 are, but will anyone care 10 or 20 years from now? Most people cannot tell the difference between an MS-69 and MS-70 or even an MS-68 for that matter.
2011 Heat Index: What’s Hot and What’s Not in the Coin Market
By Doug Winter on January 4, 2012 9:25 AM
By Doug Winter – Raregoldcoins.com
A CoinWeek Content Partner
A popular feature of the www.raregoldcoins.com blog is the “what’s hot and what’s not” article that I write at the end of every year. As its the very end of what’s been an interesting and active year, let’s take a look at what was in demand in 2011 and what you, literally, couldn’t give away. We’ll look at a number of areas in the market and determine a “heat index” based on my personal experience in the 2011 coin market.

1. Gold Dollars
This was a mixed market area but overall it was fairly strong and in some cases it was very strong. The segments of the gold dollar market that were strongest were superb, one-of-a-kind Type One and Type Three issues (especially “wonder coins” graded MS68 and MS69) and very high quality Dahlonega issues (especially better dates such as the 1855-D, 1856-D, 1860-D and 1861-D). Areas that remained flat or trended downwards in 2011 include mid-level Uncirculated New Orleans pieces and San Francisco issues. The weakest segments of the gold dollar market included Gem common date Type Two issues and MS65 through MS67 common dates from the 1880′s.
2. Quarter Eagles
Early quarter eagles were a strong area in the market. This was especially true for attractive, original coins in the EF40 to MS63 range that were priced at $50,000 and below. A few nice 1796 No Stars quarter eagles sold in 2011 and these generally saw prices that were higher than in the previous couple of years. Early quarter eagles priced at $100,000 and up remained hard to sell, unless they were either very rare or very nice or, ideally, a combination of the two.
The Liberty Head series saw mixed results in 2011. Nice circulated Dahlonega pieces were good sellers and even Charlotte coins, at least those in the $2,000-5,000 range, sold well if they possessed good eye appeal. The very high end of the market was strong. Ultra rare issues such as the 1841, 1854-S and 1863 all saw strong price increases in 2011. The surprise “trendy date” of the year was the 1864 which, in a short period of time, saw explosive price growth as collectors realized how rare it was.
Most quarter eagles dated 1870 and later remained hard to sell, even those with low mintages. There were a few exceptions (the low mintage 1875 became popular in 2011) but this seems like an area in the market that offers good growth potential for collectors with a budget of $1,000-5,000 per coin.
2. Three Dollars
After a rough patch of five or so years, the Three Dollar market showed more strength than I can remember. Buyers were fussy and coins that were not high end were hard to sell. The most popular dates included the 1854-D, 1855-S, 1861-1864 and the low mintage issues from the 1880′s. Dates that were hard to sell included the 1854-O, 1865 and 1877. The rare Proof-only 1875 was a good seller while the not-as-rare Proof 1876 was harder to sell.
Prices on better dates in MS63 to MS65 have dropped to levels that make them prime for a promotion in the coming years. There are enough nice to very nice coins available (not factoring in common issues such as the 1854, 1874, 1878 and 1889) that I would not be surprised to see prices for nice coins rise.
4. Half Eagles.
The market for early half eagles was very quality conscious in 2011. As an example, a common date early five such as an 1803/2 in AU55 to AU58 was worth 5-10% more if it were CAC-quality as opposed to the typical washed-out, unappealing example. The grade range that really began to see price separation due to quality was MS63 to MS64. There are early half eagles in MS63 holders that are hard to sell at $25,000; the exact same issue in the same grade with a CAC sticker and real eye appeal can be an easy sale at $30,000+.
The market for very rare early half eagles was hard to gauge in 2011 due to so few pieces trading. But in the Heritage 2012 FUN sale there is a superb date run of rare half eagles including an 1819, 1821, 1825/1, 1826, 1828, 1828/7 and both varieties of 1829. I expect these coins to bring record prices and the “heat” that they generate is likely to spread to the rare but more more obtainable dates of this era.
The Liberty Head half eagle market was generally good in 2011. The areas that were strongest include collector quality Dahlonega pieces, rare Civil War dates and high quality New Orleans issues. Areas that began to show some tentative strength included No Motto Philadelphia issues in AU and Mint State grades and rare but formerly unpopular low-mintage dates from the 1860′s and 1870′s. The market for Carson City half eagles in 2011 was mixed. There were not many nice coins on the market and the better dates that did sell only brought solid prices if they were very choice.
5. Eagles
While not everyone realizes this, eagles were probably the strongest denomination in the gold coin market in 2011. Nearly all areas were as stronger or stronger than in 2010 with the exception of early eagles (1795-1804) which remained off their market highs of a few years ago. But this statement needs to be clarified. Most of the early eagles that are offered for sale are very low end for the grade. Nice early eagles sell for 10-20% premiums over their low-end counterparts.
The Liberty Head eagle series came into its own in 2009 and since then, prices have been strong for choice examples of rare and low mintage dates. In my opinion, prices of rare, low mintages issues such as the 1863, 1864, 1865, 1872, 1873, 1876 and 1877 are still very low in comparison to less rare but more popular double eagles from this era.
The Carson City eagle market was similar to that described above for the half eagles. If a coin was choice and rare, it sold for a strong price. If it were just so-so, the price ranged from decent to slightly above average. But if a real “pig” was offered (and some of the CC eagles in holders are grossly overgraded) it might bring a distortingly low price. Collectors are urged to work closely with an informed specialist and to learn how to distinguish a choice, original piece from an overgraded low-end example.
6. Double Eagles
For the last five years, the Liberty Head double eagle market has seen an inexorable march upwards in price. In the second half of 2011, this area of the market seemed to weaken a bit, probably due as much to the steep rise in bullion prices as a natural correction.
The always-popular Type One market softened a bit but remained strong. CAC approved coins brought good premiums, especially for issues like the rarer New Orleans mint coins where eye appeal was a real concern. Premiums for rare shipwreck coins remained very strong in 2011. If an S.S. Central America, Brother Jonathan or S.S. Republic coin that had a population of just a few coins was available at auction it brought many multiples of a non-shipwreck coin’s price.
The Type Two market was a bit stronger than in the last past few years. The market for common dates in MS62 through MS64 dropped rather significantly but scarcer dates (such as the 1868, 1869, 1870 and 1871) rose in AU and Uncirculated.
The bullion-related Type Three issues and the condition rarity market declined in 2011 but the market for truly rare issues (1881-1886 and 1891 Philadelphia) was strong.
7. Proof Gold
This was a strong area of the market in 2011 and part of the reason was a greater supply of choice coins than in recent memory. Strong prices were seen at the Heritage 2011 FUN sale where the Henry Miller collection, which contained dozens of superb rare date Proofs, brought very strong prices. Coins that were in demand include very low mintage issues and virtually all pre-1880 half eagles, eagles and, especially double eagles.
8. 20th Century Gold
The various 20th century series saw a mixed year in 2011. Common date generic issues saw significant shrinking in premiums over spot and in some series, coins were trading for tiny premiums.
A series that was stagnant in 2011 but which is primed for attention is the St. Gaudens double eagle. The upcoming sale of the Dr. Steve Duckor collection, to be sold by Heritage next week in their FUN auction, includes many very choice, very rare issues which are likely to bring record prices. This may not necessarily impact lower quality examples of these dates but it will clearly bring a lot of attention to a series that has been flat since the Morse Collection sale of 2005.
A series that seemed to be quietly attracting collector and investor attention in 2011 was the Indian Head eagle. I only handled a few interesting Indian Head eagles in 2011 but the coins I did own sold quickly and generally to smart dealers.
All in all, I look at 2011 as being a good year for the rare gold coin market. Not a great year but certainly a stronger one than 2009 or 2010. It was a year that rarity and originality became more in vogue. It was a year that soaring bullion prices were a big story during the first three-quarters. My firm DWN had an excellent year in 2011 and I am personally excited about the coming year and what it will bring.

