Polls
Blogroll
- ANA
- CCE/FACTS
- Chinese Coin News
- Coin Update
- Coinnet. We are WI78. A dealer to dealer nationwide network.
- Coinwebsites.Com
- Follow us on Facebook.
- ICTA-Precious Metals Trade Group
- J&T Coins LLC Website
- Oconomowoc Chamber of Commerce
- Visit Waukesha County
Categories
Daily Popular
- Robbery & Murder in Louisiana Gold Coin Case. (12)
- WHY CHINESE CASH COINS HAVE SQUARE HOLES (4)
- Police Arrest Man Selling Fake Morgan Dollars…. (3)
- Bank of England Releases New 50 Pound Note (2)
- The Coin Analyst: World Coin Market Strong at 2012 Berlin World Money Fair (2)
- Red Spots on coins…very good article (2)
- Numismatic Crime Information Center January 2012 News Letter (2)
- J&T Coins LLC now selling 2012 Chinese Gold & Silver Lunar Dragons (1)
- China Battles Domestic Counterfeiters…. (1)
- J&T Coins LLC now selling 2011 1 oz Silver Mexican Libertads (1)
- Collecting Modern Commemorative Coins (1)
- How Much Is My Penny Worth? (1)
- New Lincoln cent rarest in 50 years…. (1)
- The 1895 Morgan Dollar – The King of Morgans – The Most Valuable Morgan Dollar (1)
- J&T Coins, LLC now selling 2008-W Burnished Gold American Buffalo’s (1)
- Taking place Jan. 5-10 at the Orlando County Convention Center; featuring the Roger H. Durand Santa Claus Notes Collection, along with a wide variety of United States Currency and World notes (1)
- “Someone” Apparently Trying To Conceal US Government Manipulation Of Gold Market (1)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Which Details are Most Important?
| By F. Michael Fazzari, Numismatic News May 26, 2011 |

Other News & Articles
This article was originally printed in Numismatic News.
>> Subscribe today!
How many times have you heard these words? “Grading is subjective” or “Grading is an art not a science?” That leaves a lot of room for interpretation, and we’ll examine some of that in this column. The subjective nature of grading is possibly one reason many numismatists are conservative buyers or liberal sellers. There is less risk of taking a hit to the wallet. Knowledge is power. It can be a jungle out in the marketplace where the uninformed can be eaten alive.
Grading Assistant The Grading Assistant is a comprehensive tool to assist you with grading United States coins. Get your copy today! |
I don’t choose to tell you how many times I have fallen victim and sold an item under market because I didn’t do any research before offering a coin at my price. Anyway, it has been a long time since I’ve sold a coin; yet to this day I can feel certain coin dealers salivate as I pass their tables at shows.
One personal story I use in my grading seminars is about the time I kept telling a well known dealer that he really didn’t want to purchase the gem AU-58 Type 1 Standing quarter in my coin wallet because it was not a true uncirculated specimen. He kept asking for a price and finally bought it. I learned that the small amount of rubbing on the coin did not matter in the commercial side of our hobby and the coin was sold as uncirculated.
Since grading and value have been interconnected (commercial grading) for so many years, a competent professional grader must keep up with the coin market. That is surely one reason so many of the top graders in the country are or have been coin dealers. They know how much cabinet friction to overlook on an “uncirculated” coin or when a coin merits the extra Mint State grade point that can revise its price upward by several multiples.
For the average collector, possibly most of you who read my columns, this amount of knowledge will take years of active commitment to acquire. Until you approach that level, it’s best to follow the advice of many writers who insist that you purchase the best quality coins you can afford. It’s also important that you stick with coins that have been authenticated and encapsulated by the major grading services.
I think it was President Ronald Reagan who said, “Trust but verify,” when speaking about the old Soviet Union. This holds true for the coin dealers you use also. They are a mixed bunch with varying degrees of knowledge. I’ve met quite a few who would not be in business if it were not for slabbed coins and they still want a break.
A typical case happened just last week. One “dealer” wanted to cross an expensive type coin in an XF Details CLEANED slab into a Very Fine holder. While that might equate to its perceived market value, it was still an imperfect specimen – actually buffed up quite well. What made him think that one grading service would take a problem coin out of another grading service’s holder and not mention the problem? Grading should not be that subjective – or is it?
Let’s examine one particular nuance of grading that perplexes me; yet an example such as this is common in the marketplace. I’ve illustrated both sides of two 1920-D Standing Liberty quarters graded by a major service. We’ll refer to micrographs number one and two as coin “A” and the others as coin “B.” Which coin has more detail? Which coin grades higher? How would you grade each coin?
The amount of detail present on these coins is very close and readers may be hampered by the printed illustrations here. Nevertheless, coin “A” has slightly more of its design remaining. Most will grade both these coins in the F-15 to VF-20 range. Don’t you agree?
Well it turns out that we would be incorrect. Although coin “A” has slightly more detail, it will be commercially graded as AG-3 or G-4 at the maximum, while coin “B” merits the higher grade. Have you guessed why?
Look at the date area for the answer. Coin “B” has a full date while only the last digit shows on coin “A.” Therefore coin “A” grades much lower. As you see, there is a lot more to learn about the commercial grading practiced by the major grading services than meets the eye.
New Spin: Same Type, Old and New
31/05/11
New Spin: Same Type, Old and New
| By Ginger Rapsus, Numismatic News May 27, 2011 |

Other News & Articles
This article was originally printed in Numismatic News.
>> Subscribe today!
Type collecting makes a unique challenge in numismatics. It’s more than just filling holes in an album. Even if you can find an album for a type set, the collector has to answer a few questions. Does he want a 20th century type set, a 19th century, the full type set back to 1793, or what variation of these themes? Does he want subtle varieties, major varieties, metallic changes, or something entirely different?
Fans of type collecting and modern coinage can combine these two favorites and come up with a new kind of type set. Call it type collecting with a twist. Older United States coins can be augmented in a set by adding some modern issues bearing the same designs.
A Guide Book of United States Type Coins Learn how to begin the ideal numismatic pursuit: a collection of United States coins by type! Get your copy today! |
The gold First Spouse $10 coins have been issued since 2007, featuring the First Ladies, as companion pieces to the Presidential dollars. Those Presidents who did not have a First Lady during their term are still honored with pieces featuring the Liberty figure used on coinage of the time. These modern renderings of Liberty can be collected along with coins bearing the original designs.
The 2007 Thomas Jefferson Liberty shows the Draped Bust, a design used on copper and silver coins of his time. Type collectors may want to assemble a set of the Draped Bust coinage – the half cent, cent, half dime, dime, quarter, half dollar, and silver dollar – and add a 2007 First Spouse gold coin to this set. Comparing the 2007 rendering of this old-fashioned design to the coins in actual use can be interesting. How does the modern Draped Bust look? Are there subtle differences? Has the design held up well over the years? How does the design appear on a gold piece?
Type collectors have a few more First Spouse coins to obtain. Andrew Jackson’s Liberty is the Capped Bust, a design so popular that a special collector’s club exists for fans of this Liberty. A 2008 Capped Bust gold coin would look great alongside the circulation coins: the half dime, dime, quarter and half dollar.
Speaking of specialty clubs, the Gobrecht Society boasts a number of members who appreciate the long-used Seated Liberty design, struck from 1840-1891 – and even earlier, if you include the famous Gobrecht pattern silver dollars. Martin van Buren’s Liberty, shown on another 2008 First Spouse coin, is the Seated Liberty. Add this piece to a run of Seated Liberty coinage, and add some modern touches to your type set.
James Buchanan’s Liberty was the Coronet head, used on gold coins from 1838-1907. That’s a long span, and quite a challenge for the gold coin collector who wants one of each date in any denomination. But a type collector can choose beautiful specimens of the quarter eagle, half eagle, and eagle for his set and include a 2010 First Spouse gold piece.
Look at the reverse of that old $5 gold coin, bearing the Coronet head of Liberty. An eagle with spread wings, shield on its breast, appears on this coin. This lovely design made a comeback in 2006, on a $5 coin commemorating the Old San Francisco Mint. Even the denomination, “FIVE D.” appears the same. When you see these two coins side by side you conclude they are indeed very similar.
A silver dollar was also issued to commemorate the Mint in 2006, struck with the Morgan dollar reverse. The differences between the old and the new are not apparent at a quick glance, but take a closer look at the lettering and the rims. A bit modernized.
One modernized issue that attracted many collectors at a major convention was the 2009 Ultra High Relief Saint-Gaudens gold $20. The original design, considered by many to be the most beautiful United States coin, could not be struck in large quantities, but modern technology made it possible for many more ultra-high-relief pieces to be made for collectors, art lovers and gold aficionados. The first strikes of these pieces were shown at a World’s Fair of Money; collectors stood in line to view these stunning coins.
There are quite a few differences between the original double eagle of 1907 and the 2009 piece. The motto “In God We Trust” appears on the 2009 piece, along with 50 stars on the edge to represent the 50 states; there were only 46 states in 1907. The modern coin is a bit smaller in diameter at 27mm and is made of .9999 fine gold, not .900 gold.
The 1907 ultra-high-relief double eagle, technically a pattern, is rare. If you can’t afford even a high relief gold coin, a Saint-Gaudens double eagle would look fine next to the modern 2009 piece. Always a favorite with collectors, the Saint-Gaudens design was brought back in 1986 for the obverse of the gold bullion American Eagles. The design was a bit modified, or modernized, including a slimmer figure for Miss Liberty. Perhaps a specimen of a 1 ounce Eagle, or a set including the three fractional Eagles, would be great companion pieces to a Saint-Gaudens double eagle.
One of the most beloved designs in American coinage appeared from 1913-1938 and has been brought back twice. That’s the Buffalo nickel, designed by James Fraser. An All-American design still popular with collectors, a commemorative silver dollar of 2001 featured the Indian head and the buffalo, although much enlarged. There was some criticism at the time, especially concerning the appearance of the buffalo’s legs. Show one of these dollars next to an uncirculated Buffalo nickel and note the differences. Was the criticism justified? Is the obverse rendering true to the original?
The first .9999 fine gold pieces struck by the United States Mint were the 1 ounce American Buffalo coins of 2006. Only 1 ounce pieces were struck in 2006 and 2007, with fractional Buffaloes following in 2008. One of the fractional American Buffaloes, next to an old Buffalo nickel, would look interesting due to the contrast. How does a well-struck modern gold piece appear next to a Buffalo nickel of 70 or more years ago? Some Buffalo nickels, especially some mintmarked coins of the 1920s, are notorious for poor strikes. Does the design hold up well and still look impressive after many years?
The Walking Liberty half dollar of 1916-1947 is considered to be America’s most beautiful silver coin. This design, too, was brought back for 1 ounce silver American Eagles in 1986. The obverse of Adolph Weinman’s famous design, a bit enlarged, appears on silver Eagles to this day. A Walking Liberty half dollar next to a new American silver Eagle looks great, and I have seen specially made holders for these two coins.
Add some depth to your type set of older United States coins by adding some modern issues bearing the same designs. Compare and contrast, admire the old and the new, and gain a new appreciation for the beautiful designs that will always remain favorites.
Harvey Stack to Participate in Cataloging Stack’s Bowers ANA Rarities Night Auction With Q. David Bowers and David Hall
Stack’s Bowers Galleries announced today that Harvey G. Stack and his son Lawrence R. Stack are coming out of retirement to rejoin the firm now known as Stack’s Bowers Galleries, following a two-year hiatus from professional numismatics. Stack’s Bowers also announced that Harvey Stack, considered to be a numismatic legend, will join with two more titans of the industry, Q. David Bowers, Stack’s Bowers chairman emeritus, and David Hall, president of Collectors Universe, to catalog the ultra high-end Rarities Night Auction, the feature official auction event presented by Stack’s Bowers Galleries at the ANA World’s Fair of Money in Chicago this August.
“The value of this addition of Harvey and Larry Stack to the Stack’s Bowers team is simply beyond measure,” said Greg Roberts, CEO of parent corporation Spectrum Group International, Inc. “Harvey’s lifetime of experience has greatly influenced this industry, and he brings with him a remarkable sense of integrity and reliability that further enhance his extraordinary skills. And like his father, Larry was raised in numismatics and learned from the masters of the field, building his own reputation as a specialized leader in the industry.”
Harvey is the son of Morton M. Stack and nephew of Joseph B. Stack, who formed Stack’s rare coin business in 1933, where Harvey worked as a full-time staff member for 62 years, from 1947 until his retirement in 2009 as chief manager of business affairs. During those six decades, Harvey personally conducted more auction sales than anyone in the numismatic industry, and he appraised and cataloged countless numismatic rarities and was responsible for the sale of some of the most spectacular collections in history, such as the Anderson Dupont Collection, the Davis-Graves Collection, and the Harold S. Bareford Collection.
A member of the American Numismatic Association (ANA) for more than half a century, Harvey has been a staunch supporter of the organization through the years, including contributing to the building of its Colorado Springs headquarters, which houses the Stack’s Gallery endowed by the family and bearing its name. He was also directly involved with the first ANA Grading Guide and has received the Association’s Medal of Merit, and in 1997 he was named the ANA Numismatist of the Year in recognition of 50 years of service to the coin collecting hobby. Harvey served as president of the Professional Numismatists Guild (PNG) from 1990-91, after serving on its board for more than 10 years, and he effectively defended PNG and the industry from proposed Federal Trade Commission regulations which he felt were inappropriate for responsible professional numismatists. He was honored by his peers with the coveted PNG founders’ award in 1993 and again in 1998 for an unprecedented second time. In addition, Harvey is a Fellow of the American Numismatic Society and an active member of the International Association of Professional Numismatists and Royal Numismatic Society, and he serves as a lifetime member of the prestigious Smithsonian Society.
A venerable advocate for the hobby, Harvey appeared before the Treasury Department in 1967 to assist in the repeal of gold coin import regulations unfairly impacting coin collectors, and in 1973 he was the sole industry representative to appear before Congress advocating passage of the Hobby Protection Act. In 1976 he was appointed by President Jimmy Carter to the U.S. Assay Commission, the last sitting of the oldest citizens’ commission which had assured the integrity of the nation’s coinage for nearly two centuries. In 1996, Harvey addressed the U.S. House Banking Committee to propose the State Commemorative Quarters series to enhance the U.S. Coin Commemorative program, help reacquaint the public with American history and geography, and encourage savings, which resulted in what is considered to be the most successful commemorative program in history – when the program ended in 2008, the U.S. Mint estimated that 147 million people were collecting State Quarters.
Larry Stack, Harvey’s son, joined the family firm in 1973, having learned much of the business from his own study, dealing and family experience. He is personally responsible for the development of many important and noteworthy collections and brought several significant collections to Stack’s, including the John J. Ford Jr. Collection, as well as the Dallas Bank Collection, and the world record sale of the highest price ever realized at auction for a rare coin, the legendary 1933 St. Gaudens Double Eagle that realized an astonishing $7.59 million (the two latter sales in partnership with Sotheby’s).
An experienced collector, Larry has formed major collections of French Ecus, Five-Franc pieces, and Ecus d’Or, and his in-depth collection of Celtic and Anglo-Saxon coins ranks high among the finest ever assembled. His Renaissance medals collection is now one of the standard reference works for the field. In the U.S. field he is a serious student of U.S. Colonial coins, U.S. Gold, and Type coinage. He is a member of PNG, IAPN, ANA, ANS, The Royal Numismatic Society, British Numismatic Society, and of major U.S. state and regional organizations, including the Central States Numismatic Society (CSNA) and Florida United Numismatists (FUN).
“It is a tremendous honor for Stack’s Bowers Galleries to welcome Harvey and Larry Stack back on the team,” said Chris Napolitano, president. “Their combined knowledge of numismatics is immeasurable, and their history is so rich in the traditions of the hobby. With this momentous addition of Harvey and Larry, alongside Q. David Bowers and our incredible Stack’s Bowers staff, I would say this is one of the most talented and experienced numismatic teams ever assembled.”
Stack’s Bowers Galleries next auctions are the Official Auction of the Whitman Coin and Collectibles Baltimore Expo taking place June 13-18, 2011, and the Official Auctions of ANA Chicago World’s Fair of Money and ANA/PNG Pre-Show, scheduled for August 12-20, 2011, with a consignment deadline of June 20 for U.S. material. As a special opportunity, Q. David Bowers, Harvey Stack and David Hall will be reviewing and cataloging the exclusive ANA Rarities Night Auction lots, and providing video discussions of the coins.
About Stack’s Bowers Galleries
Stack’s Bowers Galleries, a division of Fortune 500 Company Spectrum Group International, Inc., was launched in January 2011, combining the extraordinary histories of Stack’s, the oldest rare coin auction and retail company in America, with Bowers and Merena Auctions, one of the world’s pre-eminent auctioneers of rare coins and paper money. The two companies unite to share a combined legacy that spans more than 100 years, and includes the cataloging and sale of many of the most valuable collections to ever cross an auction block – the John. J. Ford, Jr. and Louis E. Eliasberg collections, the Harry W. Bass, Jr. Collection, and the Norweb Collection, to name just a few. Topping off this amazing numismatic history is the inclusion of the world record for the highest price ever realized at auction for a rare coin, the legendary 1933 St. Gaudens Double Eagle which realized an astounding $7.59 million (sold in partnership with Sotheby’s). The company is headquartered in Irvine, California, with offices in New York, New Hampshire and Hong Kong. Stack’s Bowers Galleries is the Official Auctioneer for several important numismatic conventions, including the ANA World’s Fair of Money pre-show and convention auctions, and the Whitman Coin and Collectibles Expos in Baltimore, three times yearly, and Philadelphia.
J&T Coins LLC would like to wish you a
safe and happy Memorial Day Weekend.
We will be back in the office on Tuesday.
Rules for Reportable Bullion & Cash Transactions or Lack Thereof
By Richard Schwary on May 24, 2011 6:00 AM
Richard Schwary – California Numismatic Investments
The subject of “reporting” has to be one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented in the trade today so I can’t figure out why you don’t see more about these rules in print or on the net? The reason might be that these mystical directions while holding sway over dealers are a virtual mess which were poorly written at inception and poorly resurrected a number of times since the government took an interest more than 30 years ago.
When gold was once again made available to Americans in 1975 today’s modern bullion dealer was reborn. Rare coin dealers at the time did not have much to do with bullion transactions except to facilitate trades for good customers. There were cash reporting requirements already on the books but mostly no one cared even the banks. If you were given cash you simply deposited it into your business account but most of the time payments were made by check.
Investors were more interested in how many Krugerrands they had to purchase to avoid paying state sales tax which was the way they used to do things. But then Treasury began to get interested in what Middle America was doing with precious metals and the “reporting” idea got more attention. Since that time both dealers and the public have come to believe many of these reporting requirements are an attempt by Uncle Sam to more closely monitor the precious metals because our government began to see them as a kind of unregistered security which is easy to buy and easy to sell privately.
Perhaps, but I actually believe the truth is more mundane and the government based their first decisions about “reporting” more on what was traded on the nation’s commodity exchanges and less on what was happening in coin stores across America because they really had little interest in the individual investor.
But to understand how this whole thing unfolded and why I believe much of the “reporting” requirement jargon is a red herring let’s look at the two areas most talked about by the public:
1. Cash Reporting: If you bring in more than $10,000 in cash or cash equivalents to your dealer he will present you with a Federal Form 8300 which will require things like your name, address, and social security number. Form 8300 is the real deal and presents serious legal consequences for both the buyer and the dealer. So please no winking or playing around here as this has been on the government radar screen since the cash trade in drugs entered America’s living room and more recently as terror became a reality in the US. And to make sure professionals were listening Uncle Sam prosecuted a few famous coin dealers and sent them to jail. They then published the results in Coin World which scared the bejeebers out of everyone because like I said prior to these landmark prosecutions cash was not a big deal in this business.
Also note that when the government talks about cash it is referring to the real green kind. I get regular questions about paying with wires or checks in reference to the $10,000 rule which clearly shows the public is still going through the learning curve when it comes to
“reporting”. You can purchase anything you want for any amount $10,000 or $10 million and there are no dealer reporting requirements as long as you pay with a check or wire.
2. Bullion Products Reporting: I will get into specifics further down but for the time being understand that there are a limited number of bullion products in certain quantities which are reportable and the buying dealer will file Federal Form 1099B. Now pay attention because for some reason the public misses this important point: This 1099B rule only applies to what you as a consumer are selling and does not have anything to do with what you purchase or how you pay for that purchase.
So why the long buildup and walk down memory lane? Because these rules were not presented properly in the first place the public now confuses state and federal tax issues, cash reporting requirements, federal and state capital gain rules and the use of both Federal Forms 1099B and 8300. They actually pick and choose through this dog and pony show and so the question of “reporting” is further obscured. And to make matters worse some honest coin dealers still do not have it right and the hard sell telemarketers use “reporting requirements” and fear mongering as a blunt club to “steer” new investors into the worst possible choices while lining their pockets with ridiculous commissions.
And even if you are new to this game and do a little research on your own there are questions which remain unanswered. The first thing you will notice is that many of these rules are arbitrary. The US Gold Eagle is one of America’s favorite bullion coins and yet it is not reportable but similar bullion coins like the Canadian Maple Leaf or the South African Krugerrand made the hit list.
So let me state what might seem like heresy about government commodity reporting. I believe they really do not give a fig about what you do in any specific sense and this reporting nonsense is another urban myth misread by the public and used and misused by dealers to sell product.
What really happens to all the reporting information we collect and submit to the government each year? I cannot site a single example of Uncle Sam coming back and asking questions except in the case of a wrong address or incorrect social security number. I believe no one is home in that he does not care when it comes to the physical metals because it is small potatoes when compared to commodities like wheat or corn.
If you study the reportable list below the first thing that should seem obvious is its lack of conscience intent. Some bullion product is listed but much of what is commonly accepted as bullion precious metal is missing and there is not even a provision for new products to be added. I guarantee the government could have done a better job if its real intent was invasion of your privacy and a “big brother” attempt at controlling the precious metals.
I believe the only reason we are bothered with this little sister today is because it was on a list of other big commodities and the statistical Washington wizards simply through it in on the deal because they were following orders. My bet is that in the end your reporting information becomes a very small part of a large government information stream studied by academics and burned out commodity traders.
The people that make a big deal out of this convoluted scheme are the conspiracy buffs who still believe in the grassy knoll theory. This is where the real paranoia began because they simply could not believe the government was not looking in their window.
To help sort out the situation and make more sense of a confused marketplace a few definitions might also be helpful because the word “reportable” has a number of interpretations when buying or selling bullion products.
Believe it or not I regularly receive Email which asks for the list of bullion coins which have no reporting requirements in the sense of capital gain reporting.
So some readers mistakenly think that choosing a particular product will avoid “reportable” income from the buying and selling of precious metals. There is no such list because there is no such product. Your Uncle Sam is interested in all your capital gains and losses because the resultant tax flow is important in supporting his spending habits.
But it might surprise you to find that the majority of bullion transactions are not reportable to Uncle Sam via Federal Form 1099B. For those bullion products which are reportable the rules can still be confusing because there are minimum size requirements.
The really good news here is that if the few government reporting requirements bother you, it is easy to do your homework and avoid products which fall into the reporting area. There are many low premium bullion bars and coins that have no reporting requirements upon resale and move directly with the spot market.
The following is what The Industry Council for Tangible Assets (ICTA) has to offer about what the I.R.S. wants in the way of paper work. They are describing the paper work provided by bullion dealers which relate to what you purchase or sell. These basic rules are taken from the ICTA newsletter Washington Wire dated December of 2004 which is the only source material I can find at the moment and you will just have to put up with my added comments.
First: You can place any size order and pay with a check or wire. No one cares, not even the government. The only time they want to hear from a dealer is if you invest more than $10,000 in real green cash or cash equivalent like a group of money orders purchased in smaller denominations. Then you must fill out I.R.S. Form 8300. There is nothing wrong with large cash transactions, but the government wants to know about them. And, by the way, you can’t spend $5000 today and $6000 tomorrow because Uncle Sam looks for these “chain” transactions and does not like to be fooled.
Second: There are rules which apply only to bullion and only come into play when you sell. As long as you don’t use cash you can purchase all the gold Kilo bars you want and no one cares but the first one you sell produces a “reporting” requirement. All Kilo bars are 32.15 troy ounces of gold and are subject to reporting by the purchasing dealer. Dealers are also required to report any one gold bar they purchase from the public which totals 32.15 ounces or more.
And what about those popular 1 ounce gold bullion coins everyone likes? If you sell 25 coins or more of the Krugerrand, Maple Leaf or Mexican Gold Onza dealers are also required to report the sale on Form 1099B.
But let’s not lose faith because there is some joy in that such reporting is not required on transactions involving the U.S. Gold Eagle the Australian Kangaroo or the Austrian Philharmonic. There is also no reporting on any small gold bullion coins or the popular fractional gold bullion coins which are available in 1/10, 1/4, and 1/2 ounce sizes.
Third: Dealers are required to report $1000 face 90% silver bags and 1000 ounce silver bar transactions only when you are selling. We are not asked to report your sale of 40% bags or less than $1000 face in 90% silver coin. The 10 and 1 ounce silver bar is exempt as long as the sale does not exceed 1000 ounces.
Fourth: When you sell platinum or palladium bars in quantities of 25 ounces or more the transaction is reportable. Platinum bullion coins like the Canadian Maple Leaf, the U.S. platinum Eagle, or the Australian Koala are exempt. Finally, palladium bullion coins like the Russian Ballerina are exempt.
Let me also mention an issue virtually never seen in print and ask a small favor: Don’t ask me or your neighborhood dealer how to “get around” these reporting requirements by variations on the theme. In other words if a $1000 bag of 90% is reportable a customer might suggest selling two half bags and avoiding the paperwork? Or why can’t I bring in a “friend” and both of us spend $9000 in cash and thus avoid the required reporting? No dealer in their right mind should answer this type of transparent question because it is a form of “structuring” and would make the dealer a party to the transaction. I just walk away and get accused of being rude.
Before I move on let me also say this commentary is not gospel because I labor under the same burden that you do in trying to discern what our hard working government wants in the way of paperwork. So I would not use this information to make decisions without seeking professional help from your CPA or other tax professional. I had to put that in because without it the lawyers get nervous. I would also like to say this commentary should be considered only a beginning of this important discussion. It would be nice to hear from those readers who have more or better information on government reporting requirements so this missive can be updated and reposted. Thanks again for reading and keep your head down as I used to say in the military.
Coin Rarities & Related Topics: Collecting Two Cent Pieces
By Greg Reynolds on May 25, 2011 12:23 AM
News and Analysis on scarce coins, markets, and the coin collecting community #54
A Weekly Column by Greg Reynolds
Two Cent Pieces are interesting and fun to collect. Last week, I wrote about Three Cent Nickels. Those who never heard of Three Cent Nickels have probably never heard of Two Cent Pieces either. Unlike Three Cent Nickels, Two Cent Pieces do not contain any nickel. These are 95% copper. Two Cent Pieces are wider than Three Cent Nickels and five cent nickels. Since their birth in 1866, five cent nickels have had a diameter of five-sixths of an inch, more or less.
The diameter of a Two Cent Piece is nine tenths of an inch, while the diameter of a Three Cent Nickels is seven tenth of an inch. Like Three Cent Nickels, Two Cent Pieces do not receive much publicity. For collectors who are looking for a series of U.S. coins to collect, are Two Cent Pieces an appealing choice?
Two Cent Pieces were minted from 1864 to 1873. Three Cent Nickels were minted from 1865 to 1889, though Three Cent Silvers were first struck for circulation in 1851.
John Albanese and Matt Kleinsteuber both maintain that it is important that Two Cent Pieces were struck while the U.S. Civil War was still being fought. Two Cent Pieces are thus a Civil War era type. During the war, people hoarded silver coins, including dimes, half dimes and Three Cent Silvers. More coins for small change were needed.
“Two Cent Pieces were one of my favorites when I was a kid,” Albanese remembers. “Most Americans are not even aware that they ever existed.” Albanese was the sole founder of the NGC in 1987 and he started the CAC in 2007.
Matt Kleinsteuber started collecting coins when he “was eight years old. By nine or ten, I was collecting Two Cent pieces.” Matt is lead trader and grader for NFC coins. Also, Kleinsteuber has been an instructor in grading at ANA Seminars.
Kleinsteuber continues to collect Two Cent Pieces. “I own a lot of Two Cent Pieces,” Matt reveals. He sold his complete set on a whim a few years ago. “I still collect the keys,” Matt says. Moreover, Kleinsteuber collects patterns of two cent coins. “I think some pattern two cent pieces are extraordinarily good values. Some are very under-rated,” Kleinsteuber emphasizes.
Matt “got into Two Cent Patterns to expand the series. I would recommend people putting patterns into any 19th century set.” Patterns are “great additions” to collections of regular issues, Kleinsteuber declares. Plus, “patterns are fun!”
As for regular issues, which are the topic here, Albanese asserts that Two Cent Pieces can easily be collected in most grades. “The set is short and not hard to complete,” John states. “I am in favor of any Two Cent Piece that is high end for its [certified] grade,” Albanese maintains.
Kleinsteuber declares, likewise, that the series is “short, challenging, unrespected and completable” in most any grade from Good-04 to “gem mint state. A set of Proofs is completable, too.”
I. The Set
It makes sense to discuss circulated Two Cent Pieces first, as most coin collectors can afford to buy a few of these. Business strike Two Cent Pieces date from 1864 to 1872. According to U.S. Mint records, only Proofs, not business strike Two Cent Pieces, were minted in 1873. All U.S. Two Cent Pieces were struck in Philadelphia and do not have mintmarks.
A set of business strikes need include just ten coins: 1864 ‘Small Motto,’ 1864 with the ‘large’ or ‘regular’ motto, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871 and 1872. The ‘Small Motto’ of 1864 is noticeably different from the ‘large’ or ‘regular’ motto that appears boldly on the obverse (front) of the design of all other issues of Two Cent Pieces.
“The mainstream varieties are the 1864 Small Motto and the 1867 Doubled Die,” in Kleinsteuber’s view. Matt “would recommend these two varieties for a set of Two Cent pieces.”
John Albanese has a different perspective. “A Doubled Die has to be prominent. The1955 Doubled Die Lincoln Cent is prominent. As for the 1972 Doubled Die cent, you can barely see it. I think the grading services label too many cons as Doubled Dies. It leads to price inflation for coins that are not that important. The 1867 Doubled Die Two Cent Piece is really minor,” John asserts.
Albanese would not recommend that collectors pay much of a premium for an 1867 Doubled Die Two Cent Piece. John maintains that it is not needed for a complete set of Two Cent Pieces.
The Numismedia.com website lists considerable premiums for an “1869 Recut Date” Two Cent Piece. “The 1869 Recut date means nothing to me,” Albanese exclaims.
I agree with Albanese. Except for advanced specialists in varieties, I would not suggest that a collector include either an 1867 Doubled Die or an 1869 “Recut Date” in a set of Two Cent Pieces. The funds that a collector would have spent on these two varieties could be more sensibly employed, perhaps to start a set of another series.
Yes, there are many minor die varieties of Two Cent Pieces. These, though, are of interest to advanced specialists in varieties who have been carefully studying such items in detail for many years. Most coin collectors focus on building sets in a reasonable amount of time and like to start new projects. For a large number of collectors, a set of all the dates in the Two Cent Piece series would be a very realistic objective.
II. Circulated Coins
Business Strikes that grade less than sixty, especially those that grade less than fifty, are generally regarded as being ‘circulated,’ as are some Proofs that exhibit wear. Other than the 1864 ‘Small Motto’ and the 1872, circulated Two Cent Pieces are not extremely expensive.
Raw (not certified) Two Cent Pieces in Good-04 grade generally retail from $14 to $20 each. A sizeable, established coin firm recently advertised an 1865 Two Cent piece for $4.95. While I have never seen this particular coin, I find the advertised grade of ‘Poor-01′ to be very believable.
For most dates, Very Fine-20 grade Two Cent Pieces sell for from $20 to $30 each, and EF-40 grade coins for $40 to $50 each. As Fine-12 grade Two Cent Pieces are only a few dollars more costly than Good or Very Good grade coins, Albanese strongly suggests Fine grade Two Cent Pieces “over Good or Very Good ones. If you can afford a VG, you might as well buy a Fine,” John says.
For several dates, Fine-12 grade Two Cent Pieces are probably available for around $20. An 1871, a better date, may be worth $30 in Fine-12 grade and perhaps $100 more, $130, in EF-40 grade.
Generally, Albanese holds that Very Fine and Extremely Fine grade Two Cent Pieces are “the best values” among circulated Two Cent Pieces. Numismedia.com values a set in VF-20 at about $1650, a set in EF-40 grade at around $2400, and a set in AU-50 grade at slightly above $2800. I, this writer, suggest that Two Cent Pieces in EF-40 to AU-50 grades are excellent values.
Raw (not certified) Good to Extremely Fine grade Two Cent Pieces can be easily and fairly acquired from a large number of acceptable dealers. Collectors, though, should be careful and selective in regards to acquiring an 1864 ‘Small Motto’ and an 1872. “I have always liked the 1872 in circ grades. It is very tough to get a nice chocolate brown one in a circulated grade,” notes Albanese.
Collectors should consider 1864 ‘Small Motto’ and 1872 Two Cent Pieces that are PCGS or NGC certified. There are idiots who tamper with these. Also, in a comprehensive encyclopedia that was published in 1988, Walter Breen stated that “dangerous counterfeits” are known of 1872 Two Cent Pieces.
It would not surprise me if some entity in China produced forgeries of the 1864 ‘Small Motto’ issue. These have retail values of around $300 in Fine-12 grade and of around $500 in Very Fine-20 grade. It would not cost a lot of money to manufacture fakes and then artificially circulate them, along with some clothing and dirt, in machines modified for such a purpose. Numerous, artificially circulated forgeries of Morgans and Trade Dollars have surfaced.
To build a set, a collector should start by spending a small percentage of his or her budget for Two Cent Pieces. It is best to proceed slowly.
Grading circulated Two Cent Pieces is not very difficult, though it is a good idea to ask questions of experts. Collectors should not be afraid to ask questions and should not assume that most sellers will tell the whole truth about coins being offered.
III. Almost and Truly Uncirculated
As with Three Cent Nickels, many collectors of Two Cent Pieces contend that coins in the 55 to 64 range are good values. These are considerably less expensive than coins that grade 65 or higher.
Unlike nickels, high grade copper coins are segregated into three categories, brown (BN), red and brown (RB) and full mint red (RD). Those that are designated ‘RB’ are said to exhibit a mix of original mint red and naturally toned brown color, sometimes with orange or green shades.
Business strike Two Cent Pieces “don’t get very colorful,” Kleinsteuber finds. Even so, “they are great coins. The red-brown and the brown ones are usually attractive,” Matt says.
A set of PCGS or NGC certified MS-63 to MS-64 ‘Brown’ Two Cent Pieces would probably cost somewhere between $5000 and $10,000, depending upon the quality and aesthetics of the individual coins. “A brown coin with booming luster can be hard to turn away,” Albanese remarks.
In AU-55 grade, a set would cost between $3000 and $4500, depending in large part upon the prices for the 1864 ‘Small Motto’ and the 1872. If outlays are spread over four years, a collector could thus complete a set of Almost Uncirculated Two Cent Pieces for $650 to $1250 per year. For a set of an entire series, and of an entire denomination, such expenditures seem reasonable, from a logical perspective. It is not unusual for 19th century U.S. coins to sell for thousands of dollars each.
IV. Gem Uncs
By tradition, coins that grade 65 or higher are termed gems, such as ‘Gem BU’ and ‘Gem Proof’! Gem copper enthusiasts are advised by both Albanese and Kleinsteuber to be cautious about obtaining ‘full red’ (“RD”) Two Cent Pieces.
Evidently, ‘RD’ copper coins that are stored in the East Coast, near the Atlantic Ocean, are much more likely to substantially tone and will tone faster than red copper coin stored in other regions. “If you are going to collect red coins, make sure you know how to take care of them. Use Intercept Shield storage containers and put your coins in safe” climate controlled environments, Albanese strongly maintains.
“Red copper is volatile,” Kleinsteuber declares. Though “I like full red copper, because I live in Florida, I personally collect red and brown. The [atmospheric] conditions in Florida are not good for red copper,” Matt insists. This is not only true of Florida. “There are [other] states where I would not collect red copper,” Kleinsteuber adds.
The premiums for PCGS or NGC graded MS-65 Two Cent Pieces with a ‘RD’ designation over those of the same respective dates with ‘RB’ designations are substantial. Indeed, these premiums often range from 100% to 300%.
According to the PCGS price guide, a PCGS certified “MS-65 RD” 1868 Two Cent Piece is worth “$6000,” while a PCGS certified “MS-65 RB” 1868 is worth considerably less, just “$1200.” In another words, the 1868 that is designated full red (“RD”) is valued 400% higher! In my opinion, this premium is not logical.
The fact that red copper tends to tone brown is not the only reason why ‘RB’ designated Two Cent Pieces are often better values than ‘RD’ designated Two Cent Pieces of the same respective dates. Those with ‘red and brown’ colors are often attractive, sometimes more so than certified ‘RD’ coins.
Also, “a Full Red Two Cent Piece is more likely to have been doctored than a red-brown two cent piece,” Albanese points out. A combination of incentives and doctoring techniques prompt coin doctors to transform Two Cent Pieces that are not original mint red such that they look as if they exhibit original mint red. On occasion, graders at the PCGS or the NGC are deceived by artificially enhanced, ‘red’ copper coins.
In my view, collecting certified ‘RB’ copper coins involves less risk than collecting certified full ‘RD’ copper coins. Consider atmospheric issues relating to copper, the possibility of obtaining doctored coins, and the 50% to 500% premiums that ‘Choice’ or ‘Gem’ quality, certified ‘RD’ Two Cent Pieces tend to command in coin markets.
Albanese suggests that current prices for PCGS or NGC certified MS-63BN, MS-64BN and MS-64RB Two Cent Pieces “seem awfully cheap.” John draws attention to the fact that a “MS-64 Brown Two Cent Piece is around the same price as a MS-65 1881-S silver dollar, which is a very common coin.” When I last checked, a MS-64 Two Cent Piece, of a typical date, and an 1881-S Morgan both wholesale for around $190 and retail for around $230.
Kleinsteuber agrees that prices for Two Cent Pieces are relatively low, when compared to prices for some other U.S. coin types. These are “the only neglected copper series in [American] numismatics,” Matt says. “Two Cent Pieces are lower priced than other copper coins of the same rarity.”
V. Proofs
Proof Two Cent Pieces are a bit pricier than business strikes in grades of 61 and higher. There are exceptions. For a few choice or gem quality Two Cent Pieces, with RD designations, business strikes are more expensive. A MS-65 RD or -66 RD 1868, for example, is worth more than a corresponding Proof-65 RD or Proof-66 RD 1868 Two Cent Piece. Furthermore, in all grades above 60, business strike 1872 Two Cent Piece are worth more than corresponding Proofs of the same respective, certified numerical grade and color designation.
The main reason why most interested collectors do not attempt to complete sets of Proof Two Cent Pieces is the cost of a Proof 1864 ‘Small Motto’. Even a terribly hairlined Proof 1864 ‘Small Motto’ may cost more than $20,000. A PCGS or NGC certified Proof-65 coin could cost anywhere from $30,000 to $75,000, depending upon the color designation and other factors.
For most dates, a certified Proof-61 Two Cent Piece would cost between $300 and $600. Except for the 1864 Small Motto and the 1873s, certified Proof-65 BN Two Cent Pieces tend to have retail values from $700 to $1500. Again, with exceptions, prices for PCGS or NGC certified Proof-65 RB (red & brown) Two Cent Pieces tend to be in the $1100 to $1750 range. A certified Proof-65 RB 1864 regular motto may be priced between $2000 and $2750.
The 1873s are a separate matter. According to U.S. Mint records, no business strike Two Cent Pieces were dated 1873. As with 1873 dated coins of many other denominations, there are two widely recognized varieties, which are distinguished by the shape of the numeral 3, ‘Open 3′ and ‘Close 3.’
“It is okay to have just one Proof 1873 Two Cent Piece in a set,” John Albanese relates. The PCGS Registry defines a “Basic” set of Proof Two Cent Pieces as omitting the 1864 ‘Small Motto’ and including only one 1873. The corresponding PCGS Registry set with “major varieties” includes both 1873s and the 1864 ‘Small Motto.’
If a collector could afford a 63 or higher grade Proof 1864 ‘Small Motto,’ he or she could also afford both 1873s. Roughly, Proof-63 RB and Proof-64 BN 1873s tend to retail for prices ranging from $3000 to $3500 or so. A really high end Proof-64 BN of the ‘Open 3′ variety may cost closer to $4000. A Proof-64 RB ‘Open 3′ would be likely to cost more than $4000, while one of the ‘Close 3′ variety may be priced around $3500. Proof-61 and Proof-62 pieces of both varieties would probably be priced between $2000 and $3000, usually closer to $2000.
For all Proofs and choice to gem business strikes, I am referring to coins that have been certified by the PCGS or the NGC. Buying an uncertified Proof Two Cent Piece would be a mistake.
Undoubtedly, there are collectors who very much like Proof Two Cent Pieces and do not wish to spend more than $4000 on any one Two Cent Piece. They may wish to save more than $20,000 by omitting the 1873 ‘Open 3′ and by substituting a business strike 1864 Small Motto for a Proof.
I emphasized last week in my column on Three Cent Nickels that mixing Proofs and business strikes in the same high grade sets was the rule for more than a century. (Clickable links are in blue.) For several series, collectors could save a lot of money and aggravation by assembling such mixed sets. Will this tradition make a comeback?
©2011 Greg Reynolds
Collecting Morgan Dollars Part II: an Interview with Steve Estes
By Louis Golino on May 24, 2011 7:20 AM
by Louis Golino
To view Part 1 of this article…Click Here
Steve Estes is a Portland, Oregon coin dealer and a professional numismatist who has been in business since 1963. He and his wife, Debbi, sell primarily PCGS and NGC-certified and some raw coins, especially Morgan and Peace dollars, Walking Liberty halves, and a wide range of other U.S. coins. He conducts business through his web site, www.steveestes.com , advertises regularly in publications such as Coin World, and attends coin shows.
Mr. Estes has developed a 1-10 scale for assessing a coin’s overall eye appeal, and this forms the heart of his coin philosophy. The scale represents his view of how a coin compares to one that is average for the grade and issue. Average coins would get a 5 on his scale, but he specifically looks for higher end coins that are further up the scale for his clients, especially what he calls EA-9 and EA-10 coins, which represent some of the best coins for the grade. EA stands for eye appeal.
He has also published a lot of very useful information for coin collectors on his web site that draws on his numismatic expertise and business experience, such as recommendations on coins which may be undervalued and suggestions about what grade to buy when putting together a collection of a specific series and overall budget. He also has numerous articles about Morgan and Peace dollars, Walking Liberty halves, and other series that focus on the main surface characteristics of specific years and mint marks, such as strike, luster, and contact marks, and other issues. I have found this information, especially that on silver dollars, to be extremely useful and comparable in many ways to Q. David Bowers’ Guidebook of Morgan Silver Dollars without all the historical background.
I recently had the opportunity to interview Mr. Estes.
1.) What led you to become a coin dealer? Did you begin as a collector?
A small accumulation of coins from my grandmother led me to the coin business, which I began as a dealer. I have always been intrigued by the artistic, historic and intrinsic value of coins.
2.) What do you like most about Morgan and Peace dollars, and what led you to specialize primarily in selling those coins as well as Walking Liberty halves?
Though I like all series of U.S. coins, silver dollars always held a special fascination. In the early 1960s I would rush to the bank on my lunch hour, purchase a $1000 bag of silver dollars, scan the contents for better dates and grades, then sell the remainder back to the bank before returning to work. The “good stuff” was quickly shipped off to dealers with buy ads in the back of coin publications. I learned a lot about Silver dollars very quickly!
I’ve enjoyed learning about and being part of major coin meltdowns and hoard discoveries. Though the silver dollar series ended in 1935, there were still lots of coins available. When the U.S. government removed the gold backing from our currency in 1973, I felt certain Silver dollars would remain popular for their bullion and numismatic values.
3.) Common-date graded and raw Morgan and Peace dollars in grades up to MS66 have had an amazing run recently, although they are still below their all-time highs from the late 1980′s. The remarkable rise in the price of silver clearly plays some role in this, especially for the lower-end BU coins whose price is more sensitive to the price of bullion. What do think is driving these increases? Do you believe they are driven in part by dealer promotions and telemarketers? Do you think these prices are sustainable, and do they still have more room to increase in the near future, as Laura Sperber of Legend recently predicted?
The coin market is typically driven by two forces: collectors and investors. From 1992 to 2005, collectors drove the coin market. Investor participation dramatically increased during 2010 and is strongly affecting the current market. Some of this investor interest is created by promotions and telemarketing.
Common date dollars are usually the first to rise in price, followed by all the better dates. As long as demand for silver remains strong and the overall economy improves, I see continued potential for price increases in all Morgan and Peace dollars.
4.) As prices for common-date silver dollars continue to rise, prices for lots of better date dollar coins appear to be undervalued. For example, 1881-S MS65′s graded by NGC or PCGS are retailing for about $230, while a 1903 MS65 is still $300, as it has been for a long time. Do you agree with this view, and are there any dates you would recommend besides what is listed on your web site?
There are definite disparities when looking at price levels of various dollar issues and grades. A few dates I think have special potential due to current pricing include: 1879-S R78 (MS-63, MS-64), 1892 (MS-63, MS-64), 1897-S (MS-64, MS-65), 1899-S (MS-63, MS-64), and 1902 (MS-64, MS-65). Buy these issues in NGC or PCGS holders.
5.) Do you have any other advice for Morgan dollar collectors?
I recommend collectors continue to hold better date issues and wait for the cycle to peak. I suspect better date dollars will increase in price between 50% and 200% within the next 3 years.
Postscript: Laura Sperber of Legend Numismatics posted a market report on April 29 in which she reversed her previous view on the near-term outlook for common-date, or generic, silver dollars. She said that current prices are being driven by telemarketer demand, that generic dollars are in a bubble, and that she recommends people sell now while prices are high. Although I agree with this view, I do not believe it changes the medium to long-term outlook for silver dollars, especially for better dates, as Mr. Estes explains. During the month of May the wholesale market for generic dollars has declined, as silver declined from almost $50 to about $35. But so far the retail and auction market has not yet caught up with the decline at the wholesale level. Over time, reduced demand at the wholesale level should drive retail prices down. Dealer buy prices already reflect the decline.
by Louis Golino
The Morgan silver dollar, minted between 1878 and 1921, has no real peer in the numismatic world. It is by far the most widely collected and traded numismatic coin in the world. Attend any coin show and you will quickly see that slabbed and raw Morgan dollars are everywhere. Look through the typical mail order dealer’s catalog or advertisement, or those of higher end dealers and auction houses, and again, you will encounter lots and lots of Morgan dollars. Peace dollars are popular too, and have the advantage of being a much shorter set that is not very hard to complete depending on the desired quality, but they have never been as widely collected as Morgan dollars.
There is certainly no shortage of Morgans in the marketplace. Hundreds of millions of the coins were minted in large part because of legislation that required them to be made in quantities that far exceeded what was needed for commerce. That is because there was a very powerful lobby in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that represented silver mining companies. In 1918, in an effort to prop up the price of silver, more than 270 million Morgan dollars were melted, and the silver bullion was sold to India. Millions more were melted later.
No records were kept of which coins were melted, so over the years numismatists have attempted to piece together estimates of surviving coins from various written sources. Even with all that melting, millions of the coins survive to this day. According to estimates by Q. David Bowers and other noted experts, there are 100 to 200 million Morgans and as many as 65 million mint state coins alone, with more than 10-15 million of them 1921 dollars.
As a result of all the overproduction of Morgans, some dates, especially the 1921 coins, as well as others such as the San Francisco mint marked coins from 1880-1882, are quite common even in high states of preservation. The 1921 coins are by far the most common, with more than 85 million minted between the Philadelphia, Denver and San Francisco mints. They were made from a different die than coins from 1878-1904 and are flatter and generally less attractive, especially the San Francisco coins which are very poorly struck.
Morgan dollars are an endlessly fascinating coin series. Completing the full set of approximately 100 coins, depending on whether or not one includes overdates and major die varieties, even in circulated grades is a daunting challenge, and for many a lifelong quest. Some people chose to build a date set and don’t worry about having one from every branch mint. Others focus on VAM’s, which are die varieties that are named after Leroy C. Van Allen and A. George Mallis. To acquire the scarcer dates, be prepared to spend substantial money even for lower grade coins. The 1895 only exists in proof, and the 1893-S is the rarest business strike issue, with fewer than 100 in existence.
Another very popular specialization is to collect only the coins minted in Carson City, Nevada, especially those still in their original black boxes from the General Services Administration. The GSA conducted a series of auctions and mail order sales of the coins from 1972 to 1980. Some of the Carson City coins, like the 1882-1884 issues are common in grades up to MS-66, but others are extremely rare, especially the 1889-CC, of which only one coin exists in the original GSA holder. When NGC grades the GSA-housed coins, it uses a blue and white band that goes around the holder with the grade indicated instead of removing the coin from its GSA box. But a larger number of CC coins on the marketplace are not housed in the black boxes and may have come from a different source than the GSA sales.
To collect Morgan dollars it is critical to understand the differences in key surface characteristics, especially strike, luster, and contact marks, associated with different branch mints and with coins of different years. To specialize in Morgans and build a collection of lasting value I strongly suggest consulting experts who have studied the coins for many years. Since most people can’t afford to pay for an expert consultation, or spend years studying the series before beginning a collection, it is helpful to rely on published sources. The best single one is Q. David Bowers’, Guidebook of Morgan Silver Dollars, now in its third edition.
Mr. Bowers is widely considered the dean of American numismatists, and is the most prolific coin author of all time having written well over 50 books. He became a coin dealer at the age of 17 and writes a weekly column for Coin World. He has bought and sold virtually ever major rarity and is the person who was chosen to appraise and sell by auction the greatest coin collections of all time, the Garrett and Eliasberg collections. Mr. Eliasberg, a Baltimore, Maryland banker, is the only person who ever owned a complete collection of American coins.
The prices in the third edition of his Morgan guide book from 2007 are now outdated, but the information on the history of the coins and especially the date-by-date and mint mark analysis is absolutely essential to building a solid collection. Coins of one year and branch mint were struck very well such as many from Philadelphia, whereas, for example, coins from New Orleans are notorious for their poor strikes, particularly in the obverse center of Miss Liberty’s hair just above her ear and on the reverse on the breast feathers. Coins from 1878, which are very popular, are made from different dies and always come with shallower breast feathers. There are also several major varieties of 1878 dollars based on the number of tail feathers on the eagle.
If a collector does not understand these points, he or she will not know what to look for in selecting a good coin for the grade. When I look at Morgans at a coin show or dealer’s store, I always zero in on the center of both sides, carefully studying the strike, luster, marks, and overall eye appeal, which is the most important factor when assessing a coin’s appearance. And before I look for a certain date, I make sure to consult Mr. Bowers guide book and other sources.
One also needs to know how to grade Morgans and to understand the differences between say an MS63 coin and an MS65 coin, which are substantial despite the two-point difference. In fact, the major coin grading companies were in many ways created because in the 1970′s and early 1980′s Morgan dollars were traded very widely by many coin dealers with subjective grading designations such as “Gem BU.” Subjective grading terms proliferated and prices for what seemed like the same grade varied dramatically. Some kind of more scientific approach was needed to protect the consumer and undergird the market.
The various published grading guides are very useful for learning the basics, but there is no substitute for seeing lots and lots of coins. One reason dealers tend to be better graders than collectors, which is not necessarily true if the collector is more advanced and experienced, is that they come across so many coins in the course of their work.
So many mint state Morgan dollars exist today in large part because they were saved over the years in canvas Treasury bags, where they knocked against each other when moved, and hoarded by people such as Lavere Redfield. This resulted in bag marks, contact marks and abrasions, and sometimes colorful toning even though they were never used in commerce. In 1962 the Treasury department discovered large quantities of Morgan dollars in bags that had been sitting around for decades, including the three million Carson City coins that were later sold by the GSA, and many previously scarce coins.
One of Mr. Bowers’ favorite tales is that of the 1903-O Morgan dollar, which in the 1960′s was the rarest Morgan dollar. Mr. Bowers said he never encountered a mint state one in his years as a young dealer. But in November 1962 when bags with hundreds of thousands of the coin in uncirculated condition were discovered, overnight the coin’s value plummeted from $1500 to $15. Today it is a mid-range date and sells for approximately $400 depending on the grade. In March 1964 the Treasury halted sales of Morgan dollar bags. By 1967 the New York Mercantile Exchange was trading bags of these coins for more than twice face value at a time when the price of silver was fixed at $1.29, as Mr. Bowers recounts in a new book on precious metals called “Precious Metal,” which I plan to review soon.
In the second part of this article (Click Here), I will interview one of the most experienced Morgan dollar dealers in the country, professional numismatist Steve Estes of Portland, Orgeon. I will ask him about the recent explosion in prices for common-date uncirculated coins and whether he thinks those prices are sustainable and other issues.
Louis Golino is a coin collector and numismatic writer, whose articles on coins have appeared in Coin World, Numismatic News, and a number of different coin web sites. He collects U.S. and European coins and is a member of the ANA, PCGS, NGC, and CAC. He has also worked for the U.S. Library of Congress and has been a syndicated columnist and news analyst on international affairs for a wide variety of newspapers and web sites.
Since 1997, Gold, Silver, Platinum and Palladium bullion have been approved for IRA investments.
Precious metals for your IRA…..
How it works: (The Simple version.)
- You are arranged to have a current IRA or new IRA funded with an authorized trustee of precious metals IRA’s. We can refer you and you can Google it. There are a few out there. We can help with questions you should ask about fees and product identity. The choice of course is yours.
- Once you decide who the trustee is you arrange to have the IRA funds transferred to the new trustee. This needs to be done trustee to trustee.
- Once the new trustee gets the funds they will issue J&T Coins LLC a purchase order for your transaction. We would then arrange to have your order shipped to the trustee. (More about locking in your order below).
- Once the trustee gets the order they will issue J&T Coins LLC a check. We are not paid until the precious metals are in your IRA accout.
You can lock your order at anytime during the process. The most common date is the date funds are transferred to your precious metals IRA. We will discuss with you what combination of gold, silver, platinum and palladium options are available to you.
What can I put in a precious metals IRA?
Since 1997, Gold, Silver, Platinum and Palladium bullion have been approved for IRA investments.
American Gold Eagles are the only gold coins specifically approved for IRA investments. Other gold coins to be eligible as an IRA investment must be at least 99.5% pure gold and be legal tender coins. Two examples of this would be Canadian Maple Leafs and Chinese Pandas.
South African Kruggerands, Mexican 50 Peso’s and old US gold coins (90% pure) are not legal investments for IRAs.
Gold bullion bars that are 99.99% are also legal investments for IRAs. Popular sizes are 1 oz, 100 grams (about 3.212 oz) 10 oz and kilo (32.15 oz) generally the larger the bar the smaller the markup over spot gold.
American Silver Eagles are also legal investments for IRAs. They are the only silver coin that is legal to invest in IRAs.
Silver bullion bars that are 99.9% are also legal investment for IRAs. The most popular sizes are 100 oz and 1000 oz. Pre-1965 US 90% silver coins are not eligible for IRAs.
Since 2001 J&T Coins LLC has helped set up IRAs for precious metals investors. To learn more about this call J&T Coins LLC at 866-267-6024
2011 Platinum Eagles, ATB Five Ounce Silver Update
2011 Proof Platinum Eagle Designs
The United States Mint has provided details of the upcoming 2011 Proof Platinum Eagle, including the selected reverse design and mintage limit.
The reverse design features the image of a harvest goddess to represent the theme “To Insure Domestic Tranquility”. She emerges from a field of wheat, while holding a stalk of wheat in her left hand and extending her right hand to a landing dove. This was designed by Joel Iskowitz and sculpted by Phebe Hemphill.
Out of the nine design candidates originally presented, this one seemed to gain the most praise from collectors. It was also the design selected by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, after their review. The Commission of Fine Arts had selected a design showing three hands grasping a laurel wreath. (You can view the nine original design candidates here.)
The maximum mintage for this year’s coin will be 15,000 units, which is a big increase from the previous years of the design series, which presents the core concepts of American democracy. The 2009 issue had a mintage of 8,000, while the 2010 issue had a mintage of 10,000. Both managed to sell out within approximately one week of offering.
If the price of platinum remains within the $1,750 to $1,849.99 range, then the one ounce coins would be priced at $2,092.00. The scheduled start of sales is May 26, 2011.
I will have another post on the 2011 Proof Platinum Eagle ahead of the release date.
America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Coins
Before the weekend, I wanted to summarize some of the latest information on the America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Coins. Some of the information was previously reported on Coin Update, but has not been presented within a Mint News Blog article.
The next bullion release of the series featuring Olympic National Park will go on sale to authorized purchasers starting on May 23, 2011. The previous 2011-dated bullion releases featuring Gettysburg National Military Park and Glacier National Park had gone on sale April 25. These two issues have now sold out of their initial quantities of 126,700 each.
The Olympic Five Ounce Silver Bullion coins will be available in an initial quantity of 126,700. As with other bullion releases this year, the US Mint’s authorized purchasers will be able to purchase them based on the market price of silver plus a markup of $9.75 per coin. After the APs receive the coins, they generally resell them to other bullion dealers, coin dealers, and in some cases directly to the public.
The Hot Springs Five Ounce Uncirculated Silver Coins officially sold out at the US Mint. This represented the first numismatic release for the series. The coins went on sale April 28 and moved to waiting list status on May 13. The waiting list was closed yesterday May 19. It took approximately two week for the US Mint to receive orders to cover the 27,000 mintage, and another week to close the waiting list.
Meanwhile, the Yellowstone Five Ounce Uncirculated Silver Coins, which went on sale May 17, had reached sales of 18,143 by the end of the first day of sales. This was a slightly slower pace than the prior release. The coins currently remain available for sale at the US Mint. I will have updated sales figures early next week.
Finally, some readers have reported that the US Mint’s phone representatives provided a release date of June 7, 2011 for the next numismatic release featuring Yosemite National Park. I have not been able to confirm this date yet, but phone representatives had previously provided an accurate release date for the Yellowstone coin, before the US Mint’s official announcement.

