J&T Coins LLC is now selling the 2010 Gold & Silver Chinese Pandas. Click here to order the Gold Pandas and here to order the Silver Pandas.

 Planned mintages  for the 7 gold and 3 silver panda sizes are as follows:

 Gold

 Kilo – Planned Max Mintage 200

5 oz – Planned Max Mintage 1000

1 oz – Planned Max Mintage 300000

½ oz – Planned Max Mintage 120000

¼ oz – Planned Max Mintage 120000

1/10 oz – Planned Max Mintage 120000

1/20 oz – Planned Max Mintage 120000

 Silver

 1 Kilo – Planned Max Mintage 4000

5 oz – Planned Max Mintage 10000

1 oz – Planned Max Mintage 800000

 All are legal tender of P.R.C.

 The 5 oz and Kilo Gold and Silver sizes are typically available in March of each year. If you would like to order one of these please call us at 866-267-6024.

 Mintages for the 1 oz silver panda increased to 800000 this year from 600000 last year. The 1 oz gold panda has a maximum mintage of 300000 this year up from 140000 for last year. The remaining gold sizes have also shown big increases with each having a maximum mintage of 120000.  

 With very strong demand for the series sellouts are expected. The question is for which sizes?

Mintage figures provided by Chinese-coins.blogspot.com

 

By Harry Miller, Numismatic News

December 08, 2009

In the past week we have had the U.S. Mint stop delivery of silver Eagles first and then gold Eagles. This has caused a rise in the premium of coins available for immediate delivery; however, word is deliveries will resume in about two weeks. Many believe this is an attempt to slow the market down by curbing the off take of physical delivery. Another indication of that are the discounts on methods of holding paper forms of bullion such as ETFs.

We again have higher premiums on proof gold Eagles, which are steadily going into many retirement programs and increases in many premiums of earlier U.S. gold type coins.

Morgan and Peace dollars are stable with a few minor negative adjustments in some high end items, but the market tone seems to have changed to a much more positive one. There is heavy demand for circulated common date issues and brisk trading in low to mid-range mint state coins. This is evidenced by the lack of any discounting on bulk deals in the wholesale markets and at shows.

Proof sets and Mint sets are stable with only positive movement over the last two weeks. Pre-1965 sets and many silver quarter sets now have a floor because melt value is near dealer bids.

By Eric Morath

The falling popularity of the National Hockey League’s Tampa Bay Lightning is threatening to cut into recoveries for National Gold Exchange Inc.’s creditors.

The Chapter 11 trustee operating National Gold Exchange is seeking to unload the Tampa, Fla., coin wholesaler’s Lightning season tickets as part of his effort to sell assets to repay creditors.

But the trustee said chances of getting full price for the $101.75 per seat tickets are slim.

Individual game “tickets can be sold for anywhere between 30% and 70% below face value,” trustee Joseph J. Luzinski said in bankruptcy-court papers. He also noted that it appears many other season ticketholders are trying to sell their seats and that tickets typically are available at the box office on the day of the game.

Luzinski suggested the company try to hawk the Lightning tickets on eBay or Craigslist because listings on those Web sites are free. A classified ad in the in the Tampa Tribune would cost the company $150, he said.

The Lightning electrified the state of Florida in 2004 when it became the southernmost team ever to win hockey’s Stanley Cup. As defending NHL champions, the Lightning ranked second in total attendance.

This season, the second-place Lighting sell only 74% of their seats on average, according to ESPN. That ranks second worst in the 30-team league.

Bankruptcy Beat favorite Phoenix Coyotes bring up the rear, selling only 56% of their seats.

SPDR GOLD TRUST SALES

Gold bubble worries lead to significant sell-off in top gold ETF

Investors have been taking profits in their holdings in the world’s largest gold ETF on ‘burst bubble’ worries

Author: Lawrence Williams

Posted: Wednesday , 09 Dec 2009

LONDON -

The world’s largest gold-backed exchange-traded fund, SPDR Gold Trust (GLD), noted that its holdings fell to 1,116.247 tonnes, worth over $41 billion at the current gold price, as of December 8th. This represented a fall of 1.2 percent or more than 13 tonnes in a day and was the largest one-day drop in around five months according to a Reuters report. The SPDR Gold Trust ETF hit a record high of 1,134.03 tonnes on June 1, and up until recently had been climbing back towards this level again.

Further falls were expected to be announced today as the gold market is going through a period of uncertainty and some investors are liquidating some or all of their holdings, and taking some hefty profits, in case the recent gold price falls are because a gold price ‘bubble’ has burst.

The SPDR Gold Trust gold holdings are larger than those of most nations’ Central Banks, and there has always been a worry that this overhang of gold, effectively in fickle investors’ hands, could in itself prompt a catastrophic fall in the gold price if sentiment moved sufficiently to generate a major sell-off, leading to a downwards price spiral.

So far this has not happened, and with the weaker dollar this morning seeing the gold price pick up, and continuing economic uncertainty, there is evidence of buyers coming back into the gold market seeing the earlier falls as a good buying opportunity, and ignoring the ‘bubble’ talk.

There is no doubt that the recent sharp movements in the gold price that have seen it fluctuate up and back down by nearly $100 in the past weeks make this a market for those with nerves of steel. Several observers have warned of excessive volatility ahead and these warnings are definitely coming into play. The fundamentals which have been driving the gold price upwards are still in play, but as we have warned before on Mineweb, markets are often driven by investor sentiment and if the force is no longer seen to be with gold there could be even more volatility ahead for the price until some stability sets in.

Movements up or down in the SPDR gold ETF holdings will thus be watched with particular interest over the next few days as this will be a good indicator of where gold investment sentiment is trending.

WASHINGTON (Commodity Online): The United States Mint has suspended sale of its one ounce gold coin and in a statement it said the mint has depleted its inventory of 2009 American Buffalo one ounce gold bullion coins.

According to Mineweb, supply problems also persist with smaller gold coins, particularly given the enormous demand for fractional sized gold coins following the suspension of the one ounce Gold Eagles. Thus the Mint was forced to issue a second memo on Friday saying the American Eagle Gold Tenth-Ounce Coin inventory was depleted and that inventory for the half-ounce and quarter-ounce coins remains very limited. Following the sale of these remaining gold coins on Friday, the Mint anticipated that it would again offer all fractional sizes by mid-December, but in an allocation process.

The resumption of American Silver Eagle bullion sales will resume this week. These silver coins were suspended along with the one ounce gold coins a week ago – also due to depletion.

The Mint had been trying to control sales by not releasing the 2009 coins for sale until late in the year – they are usually available throughout the year, but demand has proven to be enormous. This doesn’t mean though that coins are not available to the US public as some authorized dealers will continue to hold stocks, although these are being depleted rapidly and premiums charged on sales are increasing.

According to a report on website Coinupdate.com “The US Mint began sales of fractional weight American Gold Eagle bullion coins on December 3, 2009…. These fractional Gold Eagles are typically available throughout the year, but this year the Mint delayed the release to focus production on the one ounce bullion coins. After only one day of availability, the US Mint recorded sales of 56,000 of the one-half ounce coins, 58,000 of the one-quarter ounce coins, and 260,000 of the one-tenth ounce coins. They have indicated that the inventory for one-tenth ounce coins has already been depleted and the inventory for one-half and one-quarter ounce coins is limited. The remaining limited inventory will be offered via the US Mint’s standard allocation process and additional inventory is expected to be available in mid-December.”

While the shortage of US Mint offerings due to demand exceeding supply is, in reality, not that significant in terms of global gold sales it does demonstrate the extent to which demand for easily available physical gold has increased over the past two years. Some of this has been the ever increasing interest by the U.S. public in gold in general and also a certain amount of distrust generated by some commentators as to whether the various ‘paper gold’ offerings were secure.

(Source: Mineweb)

Will gold supply run out as Barrick Gold warns?

 By David Vaughn

Barrick Gold says the world gold supply has run out. Wow! Isn’t that what some have been predicting for the past 10 years? The president of the largest gold company in the world, Barrick Gold, has just recently announced that gold production peaked in the year 2,000.

It is becoming increasingly more and more difficult to find significant deposits of gold ore. And as the tide has turned the central banks have now become serious buyers of gold and no longer sellers. China has doubled its gold reserves these past 10 years. Asia is turning those worthless US dollars into gold.

Will someone please tell Sarah Palin to get a haircut and take a class in rhetoric?

Rhetoric is simply the art of learning to speak well. Persuasive speech without the mouthful of peanuts. And through the power of effective speech your life begins to develop a sense of purpose and you can influence the thoughts and dreams of a nation.

Sarah’s recent appearance on The Oprah Winfrey Show rocketed Oprah’s show to its best numbers in 2 years. Guess someone’s listening to her. The world awaits your destiny, Sarah.

Ever wonder why Adam decided to share with Eve that forbidden bite? Adam considered Gods wrath. He considered his wife’s wrath. It’s easy to conclude whose wrath he was most afraid of.

And what about investing in those mining companies producing gold and exploring for new deposits? A lot of money to be made here as long as you remember you’re dealing with speculation.

I like that word.

Let me say it again. Speculation. Has a soothing comfortable effect on the tongue. Technically, there is a difference between the term speculation and investment. Investment supposedly promises safety and speculation in the past has always been defined as risk. If there is any one thing investors have learned these past 10 years is that no investment is without substantial risk.

Remember Uncle Bernie?

Bernard Madoff? For years known as Wall Street’s most successful money manager. It is really best to classify any and all investing as speculation. There are no guarantees where ever you place your money. That’s a hard pill to swallow for 401K participants who were counting on 30% annual returns until retirement. And back to Uncle Bernie. I understand that about 50 billion still remains unaccounted for.

What about speculating in mining stocks?

There are those who promise significant profits in just a couple of weeks. Nostradamus couldn’t do better. Somehow I feel a chapter needs to be written about gold speculation. So here we go.

When you hear any one touting a particular gold or silver mining company as a sure thing then head for the hills. The following terms below are good warnings to look for. When you hear the following terms below run.

“the next big thing” “elephant country” “new improvements in mining technology” “enormous land position” “no cash” “no permits” “may prove up” “should” “…quick and cheap to drill exploration holes.” When you hear this kind of language it sure whets your greed.

And the following crap below is a favorite.

Someone touting an existing property having over 90 million ounces of gold before the first drill hole has been drilled. Give me a break. Or how about? “There’s no limit to the potential size of this deposit!” And the following is a good one. “Volume of ore is somewhere between huge and enormous.” “Past exploration confirms…”

And the best probably. “A great deal can be learned with just a FEW drill holes.”

A few drill holes? What a load of bull. A mining company can never drill too many holes. Who knows what’s under that ground? That’s what determines what’s under there…lots of drill holes.

There’s an old saying. Know how to make a quick 20,000 dollars? Invest 50,000 in a gold mine. There’s a lot of truth in that. Actually, a lot of truth.

If none of this makes sense then Google Bre-X. Bre-X provides a good education. And Bre-Ex is not a soap cleanser. The mining business is complicated. The geology of a site is always difficult for even professional geologists to interpret. Assay results often are not right on the money.

Precarious business.

The following names below are worth following. Lot of gurus out there worth reading. A few?

Doug Casey. John Doody is a master craftsman. Kenneth J.Gerbino has brains. Jon Nadler always has a grip on reality and emotions. Kind of like Spock. You’ve never heard of these? Well, you need to acquaint yourself with these guys. If you do you might just make money.

The following fellow below may just have been a successful speculator in gold mining stocks. And maybe not. Who knows? But the story sounds good.

”We talked about Gods grace and all the hell we raised” ”Then one sunny day, I saw the old mans face” “Front page Obituary, he was a millionaire” ”he left his fortune to some guy he barely knew, his kids were mad as hell” ”But me, I’m doing well” “And i drop by today, to just say thanks and pray, i left a six-pack right there on his grave…” Billy Currington

And back to good analysts to follow? Don’t forget Dennis Gartman. Brains there too and perspective and objectivity. There are others not mentioned, but in due course they make themselves heard. Information is always valuable. Almost forgot to mention Jim Sinclair! Been in this business for 30 plus years. The one and only gold prophet.

Is information important?

The founding father of international finance, Meyer Amschel Rothschild believed in information. Though born in a Frankfurt ghetto he had the ability to realize the importance of information. It was Meyer who put to the test that information can represent the difference between poverty and wealth.

What leads to poverty or wealth is volatility. What we are seeing today. Instability and volatility generally contribute a great deal to the direction of a share price…whether up or down. Jesse Livermore lost more money when the markets were “flat.” But with the depression of 1929 and volatility that went crazy. He went on to make 100 million dollars.

Volatility is always the friend of speculation.

Information is proving in the world markets today that gold is being recognized as real currency. More central banks around the world are increasing their gold reserves. Physical gold and physical silver represent insurance and shares in mining companies will always be speculation. Gold will probably continue its climb. 2,000 per ounce looking more like a reality down the road..Let’s change direction here and take a history lesson.

History always repeats itself. Lot to learn from the past. A lot of people often refer to the decline and death of the Roman Empire. Don’t think it ever really fell. Sure, the emperors all died and civilization collapsed. But Rome’s influence continues to endure and shapes the very foundation upon which our civilization exits. Its influence truly never died. Its influence still reigns today.

The ancient Roman world began around the 8th century BC. Just a humble little trading post that began its road to fantastic wealth by trading salt along the Tiber River. Officially, the last vestige of Rome, Constantinople, came to an end in 1453. What is that? From the 8th century to 1453 is over 2,000 years.

What does this have to do with anything, especially gold and current events? So much so that Rome created the blueprints for modern day society, modern finance and even the futures currency.

Nothing new under the sun.

Particularly economics and finance. Throughout history, the ancient Egyptians, Babylonians, Rome, the medieval era, France, Germany, the 20th century, the 21st century. Always a predictable pattern. Never ending economic cycles. A little variation here and there. But nothing new under the sun.

Pompeii had air conditioning…known as evaporative cooling. Modern day air conditioning was not re-invented until 1902. Romans also invented central heating, long forgotten, and not commonplace again until the mid 20th century. Indoor plumbing and running water was available in every major city in the empire. Both indoor plumbing and outside running water became a forgotten luxury by the 6th century. Not until the 18th century would common citizenry enjoy running water. And, oh, those flushed toilets I like so much.

Rome had the brains and engineering to build a great sewer system 2,600 years ago, the Cloaco Maxima and its still in use today. Rome’s engineers provided public toilets flushed with running water and elaborate fountains were every where.

Rome designed horse racing stadiums called hippodromes. The one in Rome held as many as 250,000 spectators. These hippodromes were scattered all over every major city in the empire. Chariot racing was as popular in that day as world soccer is today. The Blues (Venetii) and Greens (Prasinoi) chariot racing teams raced against the Reds (Rousioi) and the Whites (Leukoi).

Engineering marveled the age then.

Stretching from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to the western edge of Parthia, modern day Iran. Rome paved over 250,000 roads all over Europe, North Africa, and the Mid East. Just in Britain alone there were over 6,000 miles of paved road. And many of these roads are still being used today. Roman roads were often as straight as our modern expressways and even tunneled through solid rock where necessary. The only difference in modern day road systems and the Romans is that ours require more maintenance and are constantly in a state of deterioration. Contractors have learned to build things in our day that quickly fall apart so they can shortly be built again. More money made this way.

The US senate, the executive branch, all old ideas. Their Capitoline Hill we call today the Washington DC capital. All today’s classic buildings are patterned in the ancient Roman style. And the major building component was concrete. The secret of making concrete was lost and not rediscovered until 1756. Over a 1,000 years with out concrete until just 250 years ago.

The point in all of this?

We can see what our past forefathers did to ruin their economy and currency. And this understanding proves that what is happening today was learned long, long ago.

In an effort to attempt to deal with their increasing economic problems the rulers gradually began to devalue the currency beginning around 60AD and eventually became even worse when the silver content was substantially reduced in coins. And the economy only worsened. By the 3rd AD century the amount of silver content in a silver coin was only .02%.

One reason the economy began to fall apart in the roman world was because the existing currency was debased. Much as is happening again today. As the money became worth less and less people began spending even less money.

Always, through the ages, the middle class is eventually squeezed out of existence, economic opportunity ceases, and the majority becomes the poor masses dependant on the state. And as an economy worsens the middle class eventually became lower class.

And inflation ensued.

And of course inflation then was caused by the creation of more and more debased currency. Like the US pre 1964 coins made of silver and now made of some trash metal. The phenomenal rise in prices in the later empire followed the large increase of the amount of money in circulation just as today.

And in the later empire it became forbidden to hoard gold and silver coins and the penalty became death. Sounds like the United States under FDR in the 1930s when physical gold and silver was confiscated from the average man in the street. Inevitably, we are all just conduits for stupidity and avarice.

Jim Sinclair – “Be careful as gold is going to $1224-$1278, $1650 and then on to Alf [very, very high!] Numbers. Ask yourself if you are a speculator or an insurance holder?”

Summary

A major cycle is unraveling in the global financial economy today. And as this crisis cycle evolves the world as we know it will for ever change.

Every world cycle is about freedom and security. Some will want freedom and others will want to keep the security and the status quo. Some want to be free while others happily will wear a golden collar of servitude provided by a polite government.

Always look for the gold in the ground. “Proven & Probable” is always the superior classification for the best affirmed deposit. This is the term the banks like best before lending money.

Courtesy: http://goldletterdv.com

By Dave

Over Here. No, Over There

December 07, 2009

If you have ever played with a small dog that loves to race around from spot to spot depending on where you are looking or going, you have a good sense of what the Mint looks like day to day as it tries to cope with serial bullion coin shortages.

What’s being offered today?

A new allocation of one-ounce bullion American Eagle coins.

Will there be enough?

Are you kidding?

And so it goes.

Bullion coin buyers and coin collectors who are following the spectacle like to tsk tsk this these ongoing shortages.

But there is another small dog racing around here. It is the bullion coin buyer who is also racing from spot to spot bidding up prices of the bullion coins on the secondary market to ridiculous percentages.

Forgotten by these buyers is that the unusual premiums that occur from time to time get zeroed out. Sometimes bullion coins even trade for a discount to bullion value.

To use round figures, imagine paying a 10 percent premium for a half ounce gold coin. At today’s gold price of $1,144, that works out to a gold price of $572 plus $57.20 to equal $629.20.

Gold has to reach $1,258.40 to give the coin a bullion value equal to what was paid with the 10 percent premium. That is quite a swing and quite a nut to have to cover before profits can begin.

Does it matter?

Well, just try telling a small dog how silly it looks and you will get the same result.

Gold Coins Sell Out at Mint

By NumisMaster

The Mint announced today that it has depleted its inventory of 2009 American Buffalo one ounce gold bullion coins. No additional inventory will be made.

The inventory of American Eagle gold tenth-ounce coins was depleted today after less than one day of sales.

The inventory for the half-ounce and quarter-ounce coins remains very limited, according to U.S. Mint Director of Public Affairs Tom Jurkowsky.

The Mint launched the sale of the 2009-dated American Eagle gold fractional coins on Dec. 3.

“We will offer the remaining half-ounce and quarter-ounce coins for sale via the United States Mint standard allocation process, he said. “Additional inventory is being produced based on available in house blank supplies.”

Jurkowsky anticipates that an additional limited inventory of coins in all fractional sizes will be offered for sale by mid-December via the United States Mint standard allocation process. Additional information will be provided as soon as available.

Additional 2009 American Eagle gold one ounce coins will be available by mid-December, via the standard allocation process, he said. Additional information will be provided as soon as available.

On Monday, Dec. 7, the Mint will resume taking orders for 2009-dated American Eagle silver bullion coins. The coins will be allocated among the authorized purchasers.

“We anticipate that we will allocate these coins until at least the end of December, 2009 on a weekly basis,” Jurkowsky said.

About the Author

Tom’s career began with Coin World in the early 1970′s where he became editor of the “Collector’s Clearinghouse” before joining the staff of the American Numismatic Association, holding the position of senior authenticator for its certification service from 1981-1984. A prolific writer, Mr. DeLorey is the co-author and technical editor of several books and contributing editor to many numismatic periodicals. His efforts have earned him the ANA’s Heath Literary Award on three occasions, the Wayte and Olga Raymond Memorial Award twice, and two Numismatic Literary Guild awards. He is a contributor to both the Guide Book and Handbook of United States Coins, as well as other standard references. He also remains a consultant to the ANA Authentication Bureau.

Coins With Shady Pasts

1 Comment

By Tom DeLorey on Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Filed Under: Featured, History, US Coins

The U.S. Treasury’s high-handed seizure of a 1933 St. Gaudens Double Eagle from a British dealer lured to America under false pretenses by a Secret Service Agent posing as a buyer for the coin is outrageous to me, and should be highly disturbing to you, the collector. The arrest of this dealer, Stephen Fenton, and of his American agent, Jay Parrino, on charges of allegedly possessing stolen U.S. government property is frightening to all of us.

Popular legend has long held that no 1933 Double Eagles were ever “officially” released by the U.S. Treasury, and that somehow this made them illegal to possess (other than the two specimens “officially” given by the Treasury to the National Numismatic Collection at the Smithsonian Institution). This is despite the fact that several 1933 $20s were publicly advertised and sold in the numismatic market between 1933 and 1944, at which point the Treasury suddenly and arbitrarily decided that they could not be sold after all, and began seizing them and destroying them!

Although most common gold coins were required to be surrendered to the U.S. Treasury at face value by the Gold Surrender Act of 1933 and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, the laws specifically exempted “gold coins having a recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins” from the requirement, and the 1933 Double Eagle certainly qualified as a rare and unusual coin. These laws were ultimately nullified by Public Law 93-373, which made all forms of gold legal for Americans to own again and was signed into law by President Gerald Ford on August 14, 1974, and again by Executive Order 11825, promulgated by Ford on December 31, 1974.

This would appear to make the 1933 $20s legal to own now, a point arguably subject to debate and interpretation when the Treasury began seizing them in 1944. However, the Treasury now claims, without substantiation, that the 1933 $20s are actually stolen government property, a charge significantly not raised by the Treasury when two earlier victims of government seizure in the late 1940s and early 1950s sued the government for the return of their property.

Those lawsuits were conducted at a time when the Gold Surrender Act was in effect to support the Treasury’s otherwise weak position. In both cases the litigants abandoned their efforts in the face of the endless legal fees incurred in challenging Uncle Sam’s deep pockets. However, neither litigant was ever faced with the threat of criminal prosecution.
 
The government bases its current charges, unsupported by any police report involving the theft of property that I am aware of, on the premise that the Treasury has no record of the coins ever having been issued. However, the allegation that there is no official record of them having been issued does not constitute evidence that the coins were “stolen” in some manner, as there are literally thousands of U.S. coins in existence today that the U.S. Mint has no record of ever even striking, much less issuing.

The largest class of these are the Proof gold and silver coins dated before 1858, and the Proof copper, bronze and copper-nickel coins before 1878. These coins were basically treated as medals for the Mint’s accounting purposes, which were mainly concerned with keeping track of the metals used in them, and they were not included in the Mint Reports for the coins issued in a given year. Look at the Mint Report for Half Cents dated 1840 to 1848, and 1852. According to the U.S. Mint Report these coins were never struck and never issued. Should they be seized? Nonsense!

The same Mint Report also claims that no regular issue Half Dollars were struck at the Philadelphia Mint in 1815, and likewise that no $2.50 gold pieces were struck at the New Orleans Mint in 1845, yet both coins certainly exist! Should the U.S. Treasury therefore seize the coins, or should it calmly accept the assumption which the hobby makes that these coins were struck in early 1816 and early 1846 respectively from leftover dies, and that the U.S. Treasury’s records are understandably either wrong or incomplete? (We will ignore the coins which the Mint Report says were issued but were in fact never actually struck, such as the 1797 Quarter Dollars and the 1805 Silver Dollars which the hobby now knows to have been earlier-dated coins either struck or issued in those years. The Treasury would certainly have no interest in seizing coins which do not exist. We hope.)

Thus there is significant historical precedent to establish that the U.S. Treasury’s records are sometimes wrong and sometimes incomplete, and no reason to believe that they might not be wrong or incomplete in the case of the 1933 Double Eagle. The Mint might have released a few coins without telling the Treasury, or the Treasury might have released a few without telling the Mint. Also, there seems to be no record of how many of the 29 1933 Double Eagles reserved for the 1934 Assay Commission were actually assayed by that commission, and what happened to any unmelted coins.

There may also have been some uncertainty on the Mint’s part as to whether the embargo on gold was permanent or temporary. Though Roosevelt had issued the Gold Surrender Act, officially Executive Order #6260, on March 6, 1933, prohibiting the further release of gold coins struck by the country’s mints, the Philadelphia Mint continued to strike 1933 Double Eagles until April 5th of that year, and by some accounts struck them as late as May. There was no reason to strike the coins if the Mint did not believe that it might perhaps someday be allowed to issue them.

Thus there were, for a period of several weeks, genuine 1933 Double Eagles in the Philadelphia Mint where, under the Mint’s normal business practice (for the day) of courteously accommodating the public in general and coin collectors in particular, they theoretically could have been legally exchanged for another $20 gold piece or any $20 face value in gold.

As an example of this progressive attitude, Q. David Bowers tells in “Silver Dollars & Trade Dollars of the United States” how the Secretary of the Treasury in 1928 had the Philadelphia Mint make a 1928-P Peace Dollar, which had not yet been officially released, available to a powerful New York political organization which wished to include one in a cornerstone being laid in that year. I personally have seen a cover letter on San Francisco Mint letterhead from 1928 or 1929 telling a collector that the five different S-Mint dollars (all the way back to the 1921-S Morgan!) that he had requested and paid for were enclosed, and offering to supply other coins from their inventory.

The same could have happened to the 1933 Double Eagle, just as it did to other coins. When I was Senior Authenticator at the American Numismatic Association in Colorado Springs, I once had the pleasure of meeting with a family who was visiting our museum who had a coin which they wanted looked at. The coin was a 1921 Double Eagle, which is a very rare date despite a mintage of 528,500 pieces, as virtually all of the mintage was held by the Treasury as backing for Gold Certificates and later melted in 1933.

The grandmother in the family explained that her uncle, who was the Superintendent of the Philadelphia Mint at the time she was born in 1921, had given her the coin as a present upon her birth, and that it had been in her family ever since. (Alas, the family had cleaned it several times over the years!) She mentioned a name which I later verified in the “Coin World Almanac” as one of the two men who served as Superintendent in 1921, but I do not recall now which one it was.

Breen estimated that only 15 to 18 1921 Double Eagles exist today, and it is quite possible that all of these were courtesy releases just like that innocent grey-haired lady’s. Nevertheless, the date is considered to have been officially issued, and that makes them legal in the eyes of the Treasury.

If somebody of influence, or at least of means, had gone to the Philadelphia Mint during that window of opportunity in 1933 and requested a 1933 Double Eagle, there was no reason at that time why that request would not have been honored. There might also not have been a record of such an insignificant transaction, just as today you would not make a diary entry of the fact that you had given a friend two $10 bills for a $20.

Finally, we must remember that the Secretary of the Treasury from March 5 to December 31, 1933, was none other than the noted numismatist William Hartford Woodin, one-time owner of the two unique 1877 “Half Union” $50 pattern coins in gold. Woodin had been pressured into returning them to the Treasury in 1910, and was given the Mint’s fabulous 118-year accumulation of odds and ends, mostly patterns, in return for them. This hoard became the basis for the book “United States Pattern, Trial, and Experimental Pieces,” co-authored with Edgar H. Adams in 1913.

Woodin was a friend and financial supporter of FDR from his New York political days, and an enthusiastic proponent of his New Deal. As Secretary of the Treasury he helped shaped the wording of the various gold surrender acts, and may have been instrumental in providing for the exemption of numismatic coins from them. Whether or not he also helped preserve a few of the 1933 Double Eagles for posterity we will never know.

Woodin grew ill in the Fall of 1933 with respiratory problems, and offered his resignation on Oct. 31. FDR refused the resignation, but after a prolonged leave of absence in the Southwest failed to improve his condition, Woodin resigned again on Dec. 13, effective Dec. 31. He died on May 3, 1934, and his collection was disposed of privately.

There are many other items that the U.S. Treasury and/or the U.S. Mint consider or have considered to be unlawful for the average American citizen to own. The most mysterious is probably the 1964-D Peace Dollar, of which some 316,000 pieces were struck at the Denver Mint in 1965 but never “officially” released.

The U.S. Treasury’s decades-old supply of Morgan and Peace silver dollars, long held as backing for silver certificates, had been exhausted by a run on the Treasury during the years 1962-64, ignited by the surprising release of several original bags of 1903-O Dollars in October of 1962, which prior to that moment had been worth some $1,500 each in Uncirculated condition.

The supply of Dollars ran out in 1964, just as recently-inaugurated President Lyndon B. Johnson was beginning to exert his power as our first Western President. Silver Dollars had long been popular in the West, and when several of LBJ’s political cronies from the silver-mining states suggested that it would be a good idea for the U.S. Treasury to mint some more silver dollars, LBJ thought it was a good idea too.

LBJ ordered the Mint to get ready to make silver dollars, and to the Mint getting ready means making dies and testing them. Even though no change was contemplated from the Peace dollar design last used in 1935, the dies and hubs used for that coinage had long since been destroyed, and new ones needed to be created and tested for their striking characteristics.

The coins were authorized on August 3, 1964, but for some reason, probably the so-called coin shortage of 1964, production was delayed until May of 1965 when LBJ finally ordered the Mint to strike the coins. An initial test run of 316,076 pieces was struck as a final testing of the dies, but then the Coinage Act of 1965, effective July 23 of that year, forbade the issuance of any new silver dollars.

Bowers cites the noted Denver dealer Dan Brown as saying that the Superintendent of the Denver Mint, Fern Miller, had told him that employees at the Mint had been allowed to buy some of the test coins at face value just after they were struck, but that later the employees had been requested to return them.

I was able to confirm this story while talking with a retired Denver Mint employee who was visiting at ANA headquarters down in Colorado Springs, who verified that the employees had been given the opportunity to buy some of the coins. He told me that a friend of his at the Mint had bought two of the coins on his way out of the door on the first day that they were struck, and that the friend had spent them at a bar in Denver that night, perhaps figuring that he could always get more the next day.

However, that next day all of the people who had bought the coins were threatened with being fired if they did not return them. Several did, but the friend insisted that the coins were gone, and did not lose his job.

Another mysterious issue is the 1974-dated Aluminum Cent, and its cousin the 1974-dated Bronze-Clad Steel Cent. Some 1.5 million of the Aluminum Cents were struck in 1973 as a test of a proposed new alloy for the cent, after which a reported 16 of them were distributed to certain congressional committee members and their staffs. Apparently it was anticipated that all of the 1974 Cents would be done in aluminum, which would have made the trial pieces essentially meaningless.

However, the vending machine and copper-mining lobbies successfully defeated the Aluminum proposal, which presumably led to the Bronze-Clad Steel variation being struck. Ultimately no change was made, and the Treasury later began a quiet campaign to retrieve the Aluminum pieces. Seven were recovered, one was donated to the Smithsonian by its recipient, and eight remain unaccounted for. In the face of much unfavorable national publicity, the Treasury later declared the aluminum pieces to be illegal to possess, but wisely did not threaten members of Congress with criminal prosecution.

Five of the Bronze-Clad Steel striking are reported to exist. When they first became known to the hobby in 1994, the Treasury initially offered an informal opinion that they were legal to possess. However, after they were publicized the Treasury reversed its position and declared them to be illegal to possess and subject to seizure.

Lesser known is the 1977/6 Lincoln cent, which the U.S. Mint’s own Laboratory initially declared to be a genuine error. After it was widely publicized, however, the Mint then changed its mind and declared the piece to be an alteration, seizing the coin despite prior guarantees that it would not do so and refusing to allow it to be examined by outside experts.

(If you think there is a correlation between the publicity a piece receives and the likelihood of it being made subject to seizure, you may be right.)

On the positive side, the Mint, which has had a wide range of policies regarding error coins over the years, has showed signs of growth. At one time it declared virtually all error coins, such as off-metal, off-center and capped die strikes, unlawful to possess on the grounds that they did not contain the authorized compositions and/or inscriptions.

However, in the past quarter century it has become enlightened enough to admit that it is only human, and that honest mistakes do occur which can be lawfully released via mint-sewn bags. It continues to rightfully investigate and seize, where appropriate, deliberate errors smuggled out of the Mint for sale at a profit.

Many classic U.S. rarities have uncertain origins. Perhaps the most famous of these is the 1913 Liberty Head Five Cents piece, first offered for sale in 1920 by a former employee of the Mint. There are no records of these coins having been struck, and no explanation of how this Mint employee happened to come by them, though they were undoubtedly struck from U.S. Mint dies on U.S. Mint planchets. One of the five pieces is currently unaccounted for, having disappeared following the death of its owner in a car accident.

The 1894-S Dime is a significant rarity, but at least the low official mintage of 24 pieces is listed in the Mint Report. Extensive research by James Johnson and William Burd has established that the Superintendent of the San Francisco Mint had the 24 pieces struck for distribution in eight equal groups to seven of his friends and to his daughter, who sold two of her three pieces to a dealer in 1954, having spent the other one on ice cream in 1894! As the Superintendent passed all of these coins through the official records their legality is beyond question.

Our most famous coin is probably the 1804 Silver Dollar, whose story you should read in the book “The Fantastic 1804 Dollar” by Eric P. Newman and Ken Bressett. First struck in 1834 for inclusion in diplomatic presentation sets, in the mistaken belief that other 1804 Dollars had already been struck in 1804, the coin was later recognized as a numismatic rarity when it was realized that the 1804 strikings had actually been dated 1803 or even earlier.

Already engaged in restriking earlier rarities for sale at a profit, the Mint was preparing in 1858 to make more 1804 Dollars as well when the night watchman, a son of the Chief Coiner, beat them to the punch and made a few of his own. These amateurish, plain-edged productions were sold to various coin dealers, repurchased by the Mint after the scandal of this striking broke, and resold in the 1870s after the edges of the coins had been lettered to resemble the 1834 strikings.

Nobody questions their legality today, and the Smithsonian Institution proudly displays its recently acquired Lindermann Specimen, which was donated to them by Willis DuPont. (I know the coin well, having recovered it in 1981 when it showed up at ANACS after being stolen from DuPont in 1967, and even when it lay in the U.S. Attorney’s vault in Denver as evidence the issue of the coins legality to own was never raised.)

The Proof Trade Dollars of 1884 and 1885 have always existed under a cloud, with many people rashly assuming that these were a private production within the Mint. However, Carl Carlson revealed in Stack’s June, 1988 catalogue of the Sprinkle Collection that the dies and bullion used to make the 1884 pieces were indeed accounted for in the Mint’s records, even if the coins themselves are not listed in the Mint Report. Perhaps someday records will surface regarding the 1885 Trade Dollars as well.

An even greater rarity is the 1873-CC No Arrows Dime, currently believed to be unique, and its near-great sisters the 1873-CC No Arrows Quarters, of which only four are known. All of these began as regular issues in early 1873, but the bulk of the mintages were melted down after Congress authorized a slight increase in the weight standards to make them even multiples of grams rather than grains in the interest of promoting the metric system.

It is believed today that these five coins were rescued from oblivion out of the coins submitted to the 1874 Assay Commission, just as some of the 1933 Double Eagles might have survived the 1934 Assay Commission. As long as the government was reimbursed for the metal, there was no reason why any of them should not have been saved.

Finally, we have the 1870-S Half Dime, Silver Dollar and $3 gold piece. None of these are listed in the Mint Report, yet nine or ten of the Dollars have been known for years. The unique Half Dime was not discovered until 1978, when it was purchased over the counter at a small coin shop here in Cook County as a regular type coin!

The currently-believed unique 1870-S $3 made its first appearance (outside of its supposed resting place in the cornerstone of the San Francisco Mint, which was laid in 1870) in an advertisement in the April, 1907 “The Numismatist” by H. T. VanCamp of New York. It next appeared in the May, 1909 “The Numismatist,” as a reference in a notice entitled “A Monograph of the Five-Dollar Piece and its Varieties in Preparation.”

The notice told about a work being prepared by the $3’s owner, who owned the only known complete collection of $3 gold pieces, namely “the well-known collector of United States gold coins,” Mr. William H. Woodin! Did Woodin also own a complete set of St. Gaudens $20? We may never know.

Originally published in COINage magazine in May, 1996. Reprinted with permission of Harlan J Berk Ltd. Copyright 1997 by Thomas K. DeLorey.

http://www.harlanjberk.com. E-mail: info@harlanjberk.com

Gold’s golden journey through the ages

 

NEW DELHI (Commodity Online) : The precious yellow metal is going great guns by setting new records since last week.

Let’s see how the yellow metal achieved every milestone on its journey to the top.

Trade commodities or equities from across the globe. Join Now

* January 1980 – Gold hits record high at $850 per ounce. High inflation because of strong oil prices, Soviet intervention in Afghanistan and the impact of the Iranian revolution, prompts investors to move into the metal.

* August 1999 – Gold falls to $251.70 on fears of central banks reducing reserves, and mining companies selling gold in forward markets to protect against falling prices.

* October 1999 – Gold reaches a two-year high at $338 after agreement to limit gold sales by 15 European central banks. Market sentiment toward gold begins to turn more positive.

* February 2003 – Gold reaches a four and a half year high on safe-haven buying in run-up to conflict with Iraq.

* December-January 2004 – Gold breaks above $400, levels last traded in 1988. Investors turn to gold as risk insurance.

* November 2005 – Spot gold breaches $500 for the first time since December 1987, when spot hit $502.97.

* April 11, 2006 – Gold surpasses $600, the highest since December 1980, with funds and investors jumping into commodities on a weak dollar, firm oil prices and geopolitical worries.

* May 12 – Gold prices peak at $730 an ounce with funds and investors pouring money into commodities on a weak dollar, firm oil prices and political tensions over Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

* June 14 – Gold falls 26% to $543 from its 26-year peak after investors sell out of commodity positions.

* Nov. 7, 2007 – Spot gold hits 28-year high: $845.40/ounce.

* Jan. 2, 2008 – Spot gold breaks above $850.

* March 13 – Benchmark gold contract trades over $1,000 for the first time in the US futures market.

* March 17 – Spot gold hits an all-time high of $1,030.80 an ounce. US gold futures touch record peak of $1,033.90.

* Sept. 17 – Spot gold rises almost $90/ounce, a record one-day gain. Investors seek safety amid equity market turmoil.

* Feb. 20, 2009 – US gold futures rise back above $1,000 an ounce to a peak of $1,005.40 as investors turn to gold as major economies face recession and equity markets tumble.

* Sept. 8 – US gold futures hit $1,000 an ounce for the first time since February as the dollar’s weakness, concerns about the sustainability of global economic recovery and worries about future inflation underpinned sentiment.

* Nov. 3 – Gold crests $1,080 an ounce, defying dollar strength as the International Monetary Fund’s 200-tonne sale of gold to India’s central bank boosts sentiment.

* Nov. 6 – New York gold futures rise to a record above $1,100 as the dollar eases in the wake of weaker-than-expected US non-farm payrolls data, while spot gold hits a record high at $1,100.90 an ounce.

* Nov 26 – Spot gold rises above $1,192.60 per ounce, extending gains from the day before.

* Dec 1 – Gold hits record highs of $1,198.70 an ounce in Europe, as the dollar weakens against a basket of currencies after policy comments from the Bank of Japan.

* Dec 3 – Spot gold price rises to $1,227 per ounce.

« Older PostsNewer Posts »